Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1.2k
Handle deferred evaluation of annotations in Python 3.14#10381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
We should wait until we can test 3.14 in CI before merging this. I also don't really like that we need to duplicate a lot of tests. Maybe we can come up with a better solution for dealing conditional errors in our tests. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Great !
Agree, so it's Blocked bypylint-dev/astroid#2731 and then the pylint equivalent.
Maybe time to design something to be able to expect something different according to the version ? something=1# [unused-variable|>=3.13,missing-module-docstring] With |
32635df
to8615074
Comparecdce8p commentedMay 14, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Explored something like this in#10382. The diff here would look much better, see379ab07. |
8615074
to379ab07
Compare🤖 According to the primer, this change hasno effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 This comment was generated for commit379ab07 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM, but blocked by preliminary MRs.
Closes#10149