Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

promql: Implement support for versioned OTel semantic conventions#17702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
aknuds1 wants to merge1 commit intoprometheus:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromaknuds1:arve/otlp-semconv-schema

Conversation

@aknuds1
Copy link
Contributor

@aknuds1aknuds1 commentedDec 16, 2025
edited
Loading

Which issue(s) does the PR fix:

Implement support for versioned OTel semantic conventions, with automatic querying for all metric versions. Behind feature flag "semconv-versioned-read" - this is a working title, final name is TODO :)

TODO:

  • Transform the label names of all series belonging to other versions to correspond to the queried version
  • Compute semantic conventions group IDs (how?) - potentially unnecessary with next version of semantic conventions format
  • Use OTel schema format v2, where definitions are included (@jsuereth knows)
  • Decide on feature flag name
  • Resolve TODOs in code

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

[FEATURE] Add support for versioned OTel semantic conventions, with automatic querying for all metric versions.

@aknuds1aknuds1force-pushed thearve/otlp-semconv-schema branch from07c6cc3 to26095a8CompareDecember 16, 2025 12:51
Implement support for versioned OTel semantic conventions, withautomatic querying for all metric versions.Signed-off-by: Arve Knudsen <arve.knudsen@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bwplotkabwplotkaAwaiting requested review from bwplotka

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aknuds1

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp