Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commitd9cb487

Browse files
committed
Better solution to the problem of labeling whole-row Datums that are
generated from subquery outputs: use the type info stored in the Varitself. To avoid making ExecEvalVar and slot_getattr more complexand slower, I split out the whole-row case into a separate ExecEval routine.
1 parent07908c9 commitd9cb487

File tree

2 files changed

+87
-40
lines changed

2 files changed

+87
-40
lines changed

‎src/backend/access/common/heaptuple.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 34 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
1616
*
1717
*
1818
* IDENTIFICATION
19-
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/common/heaptuple.c,v 1.101 2005/10/1918:18:32 tgl Exp $
19+
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/common/heaptuple.c,v 1.102 2005/10/1922:30:30 tgl Exp $
2020
*
2121
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2222
*/
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
2727
#include"access/tuptoaster.h"
2828
#include"catalog/pg_type.h"
2929
#include"executor/tuptable.h"
30-
#include"utils/typcache.h"
3130

3231

3332
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -595,38 +594,6 @@ heap_getsysattr(HeapTuple tup, int attnum, TupleDesc tupleDesc, bool *isnull)
595594
caseTableOidAttributeNumber:
596595
result=ObjectIdGetDatum(tup->t_tableOid);
597596
break;
598-
599-
/*
600-
* If the attribute number is 0, then we are supposed to return
601-
* the entire tuple as a row-type Datum. (Using zero for this
602-
* purpose is unclean since it risks confusion with "invalid attr"
603-
* result codes, but it's not worth changing now.)
604-
*
605-
* We have to make a copy of the tuple so we can safely insert the
606-
* Datum overhead fields, which are not set in on-disk tuples.
607-
*
608-
* It's possible that the passed tupleDesc is a record type that
609-
* hasn't been "blessed" yet, so cover that case.
610-
*/
611-
caseInvalidAttrNumber:
612-
{
613-
HeapTupleHeaderdtup;
614-
615-
if (tupleDesc->tdtypeid==RECORDOID&&
616-
tupleDesc->tdtypmod<0)
617-
assign_record_type_typmod(tupleDesc);
618-
619-
dtup= (HeapTupleHeader)palloc(tup->t_len);
620-
memcpy((char*)dtup, (char*)tup->t_data,tup->t_len);
621-
622-
HeapTupleHeaderSetDatumLength(dtup,tup->t_len);
623-
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypeId(dtup,tupleDesc->tdtypeid);
624-
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypMod(dtup,tupleDesc->tdtypmod);
625-
626-
result=PointerGetDatum(dtup);
627-
}
628-
break;
629-
630597
default:
631598
elog(ERROR,"invalid attnum: %d",attnum);
632599
result=0;/* keep compiler quiet */

‎src/backend/executor/execQual.c

Lines changed: 86 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
*
99
*
1010
* IDENTIFICATION
11-
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.182 2005/10/1918:18:33 tgl Exp $
11+
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.183 2005/10/1922:30:30 tgl Exp $
1212
*
1313
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1414
*/
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ static Datum ExecEvalAggref(AggrefExprState *aggref,
6464
bool*isNull,ExprDoneCond*isDone);
6565
staticDatumExecEvalVar(ExprState*exprstate,ExprContext*econtext,
6666
bool*isNull,ExprDoneCond*isDone);
67+
staticDatumExecEvalWholeRowVar(ExprState*exprstate,ExprContext*econtext,
68+
bool*isNull,ExprDoneCond*isDone);
6769
staticDatumExecEvalConst(ExprState*exprstate,ExprContext*econtext,
6870
bool*isNull,ExprDoneCond*isDone);
6971
staticDatumExecEvalParam(ExprState*exprstate,ExprContext*econtext,
@@ -448,9 +450,9 @@ ExecEvalVar(ExprState *exprstate, ExprContext *econtext,
448450
/*
449451
* Get the slot and attribute number we want
450452
*
451-
* The asserts check that references to system attributes only appear at the
452-
* level of a relation scan; at higher levels, system attributes must be
453-
* treated as ordinary variables (since we no longer have access to the
453+
* The asserts check that references to system attributes only appear at
454+
*thelevel of a relation scan; at higher levels, system attributes must
455+
*betreated as ordinary variables (since we no longer have access to the
454456
* original tuple).
455457
*/
456458
attnum=variable->varattno;
@@ -505,6 +507,77 @@ ExecEvalVar(ExprState *exprstate, ExprContext *econtext,
505507
returnslot_getattr(slot,attnum,isNull);
506508
}
507509

510+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
511+
*ExecEvalWholeRowVar
512+
*
513+
*Returns a Datum for a whole-row variable.
514+
*
515+
*This could be folded into ExecEvalVar, but we make it a separate
516+
*routine so as not to slow down ExecEvalVar with tests for this
517+
*uncommon case.
518+
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
519+
*/
520+
staticDatum
521+
ExecEvalWholeRowVar(ExprState*exprstate,ExprContext*econtext,
522+
bool*isNull,ExprDoneCond*isDone)
523+
{
524+
Var*variable= (Var*)exprstate->expr;
525+
TupleTableSlot*slot;
526+
HeapTupletuple;
527+
TupleDesctupleDesc;
528+
HeapTupleHeaderdtuple;
529+
530+
if (isDone)
531+
*isDone=ExprSingleResult;
532+
*isNull= false;
533+
534+
Assert(variable->varattno==InvalidAttrNumber);
535+
536+
/*
537+
* Whole-row Vars can only appear at the level of a relation scan,
538+
* never in a join.
539+
*/
540+
Assert(variable->varno!=INNER);
541+
Assert(variable->varno!=OUTER);
542+
slot=econtext->ecxt_scantuple;
543+
544+
tuple=slot->tts_tuple;
545+
tupleDesc=slot->tts_tupleDescriptor;
546+
547+
/*
548+
* We have to make a copy of the tuple so we can safely insert the
549+
* Datum overhead fields, which are not set in on-disk tuples.
550+
*/
551+
dtuple= (HeapTupleHeader)palloc(tuple->t_len);
552+
memcpy((char*)dtuple, (char*)tuple->t_data,tuple->t_len);
553+
554+
HeapTupleHeaderSetDatumLength(dtuple,tuple->t_len);
555+
556+
/*
557+
* If the Var identifies a named composite type, label the tuple
558+
* with that type; otherwise use what is in the tupleDesc.
559+
*
560+
* It's likely that the slot's tupleDesc is a record type; if so,
561+
* make sure it's been "blessed", so that the Datum can be interpreted
562+
* later.
563+
*/
564+
if (variable->vartype!=RECORDOID)
565+
{
566+
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypeId(dtuple,variable->vartype);
567+
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypMod(dtuple,variable->vartypmod);
568+
}
569+
else
570+
{
571+
if (tupleDesc->tdtypeid==RECORDOID&&
572+
tupleDesc->tdtypmod<0)
573+
assign_record_type_typmod(tupleDesc);
574+
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypeId(dtuple,tupleDesc->tdtypeid);
575+
HeapTupleHeaderSetTypMod(dtuple,tupleDesc->tdtypmod);
576+
}
577+
578+
returnPointerGetDatum(dtuple);
579+
}
580+
508581
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
509582
*ExecEvalConst
510583
*
@@ -2841,8 +2914,15 @@ ExecInitExpr(Expr *node, PlanState *parent)
28412914
switch (nodeTag(node))
28422915
{
28432916
caseT_Var:
2844-
state= (ExprState*)makeNode(ExprState);
2845-
state->evalfunc=ExecEvalVar;
2917+
{
2918+
Var*var= (Var*)node;
2919+
2920+
state= (ExprState*)makeNode(ExprState);
2921+
if (var->varattno!=InvalidAttrNumber)
2922+
state->evalfunc=ExecEvalVar;
2923+
else
2924+
state->evalfunc=ExecEvalWholeRowVar;
2925+
}
28462926
break;
28472927
caseT_Const:
28482928
state= (ExprState*)makeNode(ExprState);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp