- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5
Commitcad4fe6
committed
Use AF_UNSPEC not PF_UNSPEC in getaddrinfo calls.
According to the Single Unix Spec and assorted man pages, you're supposedto use the constants named AF_xxx when setting ai_family for a getaddrinfocall. In a few places we were using PF_xxx instead. Use of PF_xxxappears to be an ancient BSD convention that was not adopted by laterstandardization. On BSD and most later Unixen, it doesn't matter muchbecause those constants have equivalent values anyway; but nonethelessthis code is not per spec.In the same vein, replace PF_INET by AF_INET in one socket() call, whichwasn't even consistent with the other socket() call in the same functionlet alone the remainder of our code.Per investigation of a Cygwin trouble report from Marco Atzeri. It'sprobably a long shot that this will fix his issue, but it's wrong inany case.1 parent585bca3 commitcad4fe6
File tree
4 files changed
+4
-4
lines changed- src
- backend
- libpq
- postmaster
- bin
- initdb
- pg_dump
4 files changed
+4
-4
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1041 | 1041 | | |
1042 | 1042 | | |
1043 | 1043 | | |
1044 | | - | |
| 1044 | + | |
1045 | 1045 | | |
1046 | 1046 | | |
1047 | 1047 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
348 | 348 | | |
349 | 349 | | |
350 | 350 | | |
351 | | - | |
| 351 | + | |
352 | 352 | | |
353 | 353 | | |
354 | 354 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1354 | 1354 | | |
1355 | 1355 | | |
1356 | 1356 | | |
1357 | | - | |
| 1357 | + | |
1358 | 1358 | | |
1359 | 1359 | | |
1360 | 1360 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1363 | 1363 | | |
1364 | 1364 | | |
1365 | 1365 | | |
1366 | | - | |
| 1366 | + | |
1367 | 1367 | | |
1368 | 1368 | | |
1369 | 1369 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments
Comments
(0)