- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5
Commita80a122
committed
Change WorkTableScan to not support backward scan. The apparent support
didn't actually work, because nodeRecursiveunion.c creates the underlyingtuplestore with backward scan disabled; which is a decision that we shouldn'treverse because of performance cost. We could imagine adding signaling fromWorkTableScan to RecursiveUnion about whether backward scan is needed ...but in practice it'd be a waste of effort, because there simply isn't anycurrent or plausible future scenario where WorkTableScan would be called onto scan backward. So just dike out the code that claims to support it.1 parentd26bf23 commita80a122
2 files changed
+13
-9
lines changedLines changed: 1 addition & 2 deletions
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
6 | 6 |
| |
7 | 7 |
| |
8 | 8 |
| |
9 |
| - | |
| 9 | + | |
10 | 10 |
| |
11 | 11 |
| |
12 | 12 |
| |
| |||
419 | 419 |
| |
420 | 420 |
| |
421 | 421 |
| |
422 |
| - | |
423 | 422 |
| |
424 | 423 |
| |
425 | 424 |
| |
|
Lines changed: 12 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
8 | 8 |
| |
9 | 9 |
| |
10 | 10 |
| |
11 |
| - | |
| 11 | + | |
12 | 12 |
| |
13 | 13 |
| |
14 | 14 |
| |
| |||
31 | 31 |
| |
32 | 32 |
| |
33 | 33 |
| |
34 |
| - | |
35 | 34 |
| |
36 | 35 |
| |
37 | 36 |
| |
38 | 37 |
| |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
39 | 46 |
| |
40 | 47 |
| |
41 |
| - | |
| 48 | + | |
42 | 49 |
| |
43 | 50 |
| |
44 | 51 |
| |
45 | 52 |
| |
46 | 53 |
| |
47 | 54 |
| |
48 | 55 |
| |
49 |
| - | |
50 |
| - | |
51 |
| - | |
| 56 | + | |
52 | 57 |
| |
53 | 58 |
| |
54 | 59 |
| |
| |||
114 | 119 |
| |
115 | 120 |
| |
116 | 121 |
| |
117 |
| - | |
| 122 | + | |
118 | 123 |
| |
119 | 124 |
| |
120 | 125 |
| |
|
0 commit comments
Comments
(0)