Commit5057366

committed

Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name.

check_object_ownership() isn't happy about the null relation pointer.We could fix it there, but this seems more future-proof.

1 parent59414cd commit5057366Copy full SHA for 5057366

File tree

-0

lines changed

-0

lines changed

Lines changed: 6 additions & 0 deletions

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ get_object_address_relobject(ObjectType objtype, List *objname,`
`498`	`498`	`address.objectId=`
`499`	`499`	`get_rewrite_oid_without_relid(depname,&reloid,missing_ok);`
`500`	`500`	`address.objectSubId=0;`
	`501`	`+`
	`502`	`+/*`
	`503`	`+ * Caller is expecting to get back the relation, even though we`
	`504`	`+ * didn't end up using it to find the rule.`
	`505`	`+ */`
	`506`	`+relation=heap_open(reloid,AccessShareLock);`
`501`	`507`	`}`
`502`	`508`	`else`
`503`	`509`	`{`

Comments

(0)