- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork28
Commite6cba71
committed
Add some code to Assert that when we release pin on a buffer, we are
not holding the buffer's cntx_lock or io_in_progress_lock. A recentreport from Litao Wu makes me wonder whether it is ever possible forus to drop a buffer and forget to release its cntx_lock. The Assertdoes not fire in the regression tests, but that proves little ...1 parent8d64b56 commite6cba71
3 files changed
+29
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
8 | 8 | | |
9 | 9 | | |
10 | 10 | | |
11 | | - | |
| 11 | + | |
12 | 12 | | |
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
| |||
611 | 611 | | |
612 | 612 | | |
613 | 613 | | |
| 614 | + | |
614 | 615 | | |
| 616 | + | |
| 617 | + | |
| 618 | + | |
| 619 | + | |
615 | 620 | | |
616 | 621 | | |
617 | 622 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | | - | |
| 18 | + | |
19 | 19 | | |
20 | 20 | | |
21 | 21 | | |
| |||
519 | 519 | | |
520 | 520 | | |
521 | 521 | | |
| 522 | + | |
| 523 | + | |
| 524 | + | |
| 525 | + | |
| 526 | + | |
| 527 | + | |
| 528 | + | |
| 529 | + | |
| 530 | + | |
| 531 | + | |
| 532 | + | |
| 533 | + | |
| 534 | + | |
| 535 | + | |
| 536 | + | |
| 537 | + | |
| 538 | + | |
| 539 | + | |
| 540 | + | |
| 541 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | 9 | | |
10 | | - | |
| 10 | + | |
11 | 11 | | |
12 | 12 | | |
13 | 13 | | |
| |||
62 | 62 | | |
63 | 63 | | |
64 | 64 | | |
| 65 | + | |
65 | 66 | | |
66 | 67 | | |
67 | 68 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments
Comments
(0)