Commit1f30295

committed

Remove poorly worded and duplicated comment

Move line of code to avoid need for duplicated commentBrought to attention by Masahiko Sawada

1 parent27dae03 commit1f30295Copy full SHA for 1f30295

File tree

-8

lines changed

-8

lines changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 8 deletions

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -2039,14 +2039,6 @@ SerializeSnapshot(Snapshot snapshot, char *start_address)`
`2039`	`2039`	`serialized_snapshot.whenTaken=snapshot->whenTaken;`
`2040`	`2040`	`serialized_snapshot.lsn=snapshot->lsn;`
`2041`	`2041`
`2042`		`-/*`
`2043`		`- * Ignore the SubXID array if it has overflowed, unless the snapshot was`
`2044`		`- * taken during recovey - in that case, top-level XIDs are in subxip as`
`2045`		`- * well, and we mustn't lose them.`
`2046`		`- */`
`2047`		`-if (serialized_snapshot.suboverflowed&& !snapshot->takenDuringRecovery)`
`2048`		`-serialized_snapshot.subxcnt=0;`
`2049`		`-`
`2050`	`2042`	`/* Copy struct to possibly-unaligned buffer */`
`2051`	`2043`	`memcpy(start_address,`
`2052`	`2044`	`&serialized_snapshot,sizeof(SerializedSnapshotData));`
`@@ -2063,6 +2055,9 @@ SerializeSnapshot(Snapshot snapshot, char *start_address)`
`2063`	`2055`	`* snapshot taken during recovery; all the top-level XIDs are in subxip as`
`2064`	`2056`	`* well in that case, so we mustn't lose them.`
`2065`	`2057`	`*/`
	`2058`	`+if (serialized_snapshot.suboverflowed&& !snapshot->takenDuringRecovery)`
	`2059`	`+serialized_snapshot.subxcnt=0;`
	`2060`	`+`
`2066`	`2061`	`if (serialized_snapshot.subxcnt>0)`
`2067`	`2062`	`{`
`2068`	`2063`	`Sizesubxipoff=sizeof(SerializedSnapshotData)+`

Comments

(0)