Commite57fe38

committed

Fix old, misleading comment for PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE.

The comment implies that we can eventually remove this, but perdiscussion, we actually don't want to do that ever, in order tomaintain compatibility.Jelte Fennema-Nio, reviewed by Tristan PartinDiscussion:http://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTO72jKed5461W8cytV2Msh_e+WUZjOyX_RUQCbjk4LRA@mail.gmail.com

1 parent12b964d commite57fe38Copy full SHA for e57fe38

File tree

-2

lines changed

-2

lines changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 2 deletions

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ typedef enum`
`91`	`91`	`PGRES_POLLING_READING,/* These two indicate that one may */`
`92`	`92`	`PGRES_POLLING_WRITING,/* use select before polling again. */`
`93`	`93`	`PGRES_POLLING_OK,`
`94`		`-PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE/* unused; keep for awhile for backwards`
`95`		`- * compatibility */`
	`94`	`+PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE/* unused; keep for backwards compatibility */`
`96`	`95`	`}PostgresPollingStatusType;`
`97`	`96`
`98`	`97`	`typedefenum`

Comments

(0)