forked frompostgres/postgres
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork6
Commitdde99de
committed
Fix some oversights in expression dependency recording.
find_expr_references() neglected to record a dependency on the result typeof a FieldSelect node, allowing a DROP TYPE to break a view or rule thatcontains such an expression. I think we'd omitted this case intentionally,reasoning that there would always be a related dependency ensuring that theDROP would cascade to the view. But at least with nested field selectionexpressions, that's not true, as shown in bug #14867 from Mansur Galiev.Add the dependency, and for good measure a dependency on the node's exposedcollation.Likewise add a dependency on the result type of a FieldStore. I think herethe reasoning was that it'd only appear within an assignment to a field,and the dependency on the field's column would be enough ... but havingseen this example, I think that's wrong for nested-composites cases.Looking at nearby code, I notice we're not recording a dependency on theexposed collation of CoerceViaIO, which seems inconsistent with our choicesfor related node types. Maybe that's OK but I'm feeling suspicious of thiscode today, so let's add that; it certainly can't hurt.This patch does not do anything to protect already-existing views, onlyviews created after it's installed. But seeing that the issue has beenthere a very long time and nobody noticed till now, that's probably goodenough.Back-patch to all supported branches.Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/20171023150118.1477.19174@wrigleys.postgresql.org1 parent7c70a12 commitdde99de
1 file changed
+26
-0
lines changedOriginal file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
1658 | 1658 |
| |
1659 | 1659 |
| |
1660 | 1660 |
| |
| 1661 | + | |
| 1662 | + | |
| 1663 | + | |
| 1664 | + | |
| 1665 | + | |
| 1666 | + | |
| 1667 | + | |
| 1668 | + | |
| 1669 | + | |
| 1670 | + | |
| 1671 | + | |
| 1672 | + | |
| 1673 | + | |
| 1674 | + | |
| 1675 | + | |
| 1676 | + | |
| 1677 | + | |
| 1678 | + | |
| 1679 | + | |
| 1680 | + | |
| 1681 | + | |
1661 | 1682 |
| |
1662 | 1683 |
| |
1663 | 1684 |
| |
| |||
1678 | 1699 |
| |
1679 | 1700 |
| |
1680 | 1701 |
| |
| 1702 | + | |
| 1703 | + | |
| 1704 | + | |
| 1705 | + | |
| 1706 | + | |
1681 | 1707 |
| |
1682 | 1708 |
| |
1683 | 1709 |
| |
|
0 commit comments
Comments
(0)