Commita60c16d

committed

Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name.

check_object_ownership() isn't happy about the null relation pointer.We could fix it there, but this seems more future-proof.

1 parent989f530 commita60c16dCopy full SHA for a60c16d

File tree

-0

lines changed

-0

lines changed

Lines changed: 5 additions & 0 deletions

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -463,6 +463,11 @@ get_object_address_relobject(ObjectType objtype, List objname, Relation relp)`
`463`	`463`	`address.classId=RewriteRelationId;`
`464`	`464`	`address.objectId=get_rewrite_oid_without_relid(depname,&reloid);`
`465`	`465`	`address.objectSubId=0;`
	`466`	`+`
	`467`	`+/*`
	`468`	`+ * Caller is expecting to get back the relation, even though we`
	`469`	`+ * didn't end up using it to find the rule.`
	`470`	`+ */`
`466`	`471`	`relation=heap_open(reloid,AccessShareLock);`
`467`	`472`	`}`
`468`	`473`	`else`

Comments

(0)