Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commita1fc506

Browse files
committed
Fix an outdated and grammatically wrong comment
Authored by Amit Langote and myself independentlyDiscussion:https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGCjcH0gG-=tM7hhP7TEDmzrHMHJbPGSHtHgFmx9mnFkg@mail.gmail.com
1 parenteb8399c commita1fc506

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

‎src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1517,9 +1517,9 @@ ldelete:;
15171517
* for the caller.
15181518
*
15191519
* False is returned if the tuple we're trying to move is found to have been
1520-
* concurrently updated. In that case, the caller musttocheck if the
1521-
*updatedtuplethat's returnedin*retry_slot still needs to be re-routed,
1522-
*andcall this function again or perform a regular update accordingly.
1520+
* concurrently updated. In that case, the caller must check if the updated
1521+
* tuple(inupdateCxt->cpUpdateRetrySlot) still needs to be re-routed, and
1522+
* call this function again or perform a regular update accordingly.
15231523
*/
15241524
staticbool
15251525
ExecCrossPartitionUpdate(ModifyTableContext*context,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp