Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit92c3a80

Browse files
committed
Revert my erroneous fix for Taiki Yamaguchi's DISTINCT MAX() bug.
Whatever we do about that, this isn't the path to the solution.
1 parent707867e commit92c3a80

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-12
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-12
lines changed

‎src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
*
99
*
1010
* IDENTIFICATION
11-
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c,v 1.226.2.1 2008/03/27 19:06:23 tgl Exp $
11+
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c,v 1.226.2.2 2008/03/29 00:15:37 tgl Exp $
1212
*
1313
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1414
*/
@@ -943,17 +943,6 @@ grouping_planner(PlannerInfo *root, double tuple_fraction)
943943
* right tlist, and it has no sort order.
944944
*/
945945
current_pathkeys=NIL;
946-
/*
947-
* In fact, since we don't optimize grouped aggregates, it
948-
* needs no sort order --- there must be exactly one output row,
949-
* and so any ORDER BY or DISTINCT attached to the query is
950-
* useless and can be dropped. Aside from saving useless cycles,
951-
* this protects us against problems with matching the hacked-up
952-
* tlist entries to sort clauses.
953-
*/
954-
Assert(!parse->groupClause);
955-
parse->sortClause=NULL;
956-
parse->distinctClause=NULL;
957946
}
958947
else
959948
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp