Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit8c2010f

Browse files
Fix misuse of table_index_fetch_tuple_check().
Commit0d861bb, which added deduplication to nbtree, had_bt_check_unique() pass a TID to table_index_fetch_tuple_check() thatisn't safe to mutate. table_index_fetch_tuple_check()'s tid argument ismodified when the TID in question is not the latest visible tuple in ahot chain, though this wasn't documented.To fix, go back to using a local copy of the TID in _bt_check_unique(),and update comments above table_index_fetch_tuple_check().Backpatch: 13-, where B-Tree deduplication was introduced.
1 parent185c6bc commit8c2010f

File tree

3 files changed

+9
-2
lines changed

3 files changed

+9
-2
lines changed

‎src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -597,7 +597,8 @@ _bt_check_unique(Relation rel, BTInsertState insertstate, Relation heapRel,
597597
* not part of this chain because it had a different index
598598
* entry.
599599
*/
600-
if (table_index_fetch_tuple_check(heapRel,&itup->t_tid,
600+
htid=itup->t_tid;
601+
if (table_index_fetch_tuple_check(heapRel,&htid,
601602
SnapshotSelf,NULL))
602603
{
603604
/* Normal case --- it's still live */

‎src/backend/access/table/tableam.c‎

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ table_beginscan_parallel(Relation relation, ParallelTableScanDesc parallel_scan)
196196
* optimized, but is unlikely to matter from a performance POV. If there
197197
* frequently are live index pointers also matching a unique index key, the
198198
* CPU overhead of this routine is unlikely to matter.
199+
*
200+
* Note that *tid may be modified when we return true if the AM supports
201+
* storing multiple row versions reachable via a single index entry (like
202+
* heap's HOT).
199203
*/
200204
bool
201205
table_index_fetch_tuple_check(Relationrel,

‎src/include/access/tableam.h‎

Lines changed: 3 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -989,7 +989,9 @@ table_index_fetch_end(struct IndexFetchTableData *scan)
989989
/*
990990
* Fetches, as part of an index scan, tuple at `tid` into `slot`, after doing
991991
* a visibility test according to `snapshot`. If a tuple was found and passed
992-
* the visibility test, returns true, false otherwise.
992+
* the visibility test, returns true, false otherwise. Note that *tid may be
993+
* modified when we return true (see later remarks on multiple row versions
994+
* reachable via a single index entry).
993995
*
994996
* *call_again needs to be false on the first call to table_index_fetch_tuple() for
995997
* a tid. If there potentially is another tuple matching the tid, *call_again

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp