|
10 | 10 | alink="#0000ff">
|
11 | 11 | <H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1>
|
12 | 12 |
|
13 |
| -<P>Last updated:Fri Oct3 22:36:54 EDT 2003</P> |
| 13 | +<P>Last updated:Sat Oct4 23:52:01 EDT 2003</P> |
14 | 14 |
|
15 | 15 | <P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<Ahref=
|
16 | 16 | "mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR>
|
@@ -439,9 +439,9 @@ <H4><A name="1.14">1.14</A>) How does PostgreSQL compare to other
|
439 | 439 | others. In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are
|
440 | 440 | faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a read/write query
|
441 | 441 | load. MySQL is faster for simple SELECT queries done by a few users.
|
442 |
| - Of course, MySQL does not haveany of the features mentioned in the |
| 442 | + Of course, MySQL does not havemost of the features mentioned in the |
443 | 443 | <I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and
|
444 |
| - features,though we continue to improve performance in every |
| 444 | + features,and we continue to improve performance in every |
445 | 445 | release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to
|
446 | 446 | MySQL at<Ahref="http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html">
|
447 | 447 | http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR>
|
|