Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit7ca4485

Browse files
committed
Update MySQL mention.
1 parent5f0eb3f commit7ca4485

File tree

2 files changed

+13
-11
lines changed

2 files changed

+13
-11
lines changed

‎doc/FAQ

Lines changed: 9 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
11

2+
]
3+
24
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL
35

4-
Last updated: Fri Oct 321:39:47 EDT 2003
6+
Last updated: Fri Oct 322:36:54 EDT 2003
57

68
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
79

@@ -341,12 +343,12 @@
341343
source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
342344
others. In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we
343345
are faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a
344-
read/write query load. MySQL is faster forSELECT queries done
345-
by a few users. Of course, MySQL does not have any of the
346-
features mentioned in the Features section above. We are built
347-
for reliability and features, though we continue to improve
348-
performance in every release. There is an interesting Web page
349-
comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at
346+
read/write query load. MySQL is faster forsimple SELECT
347+
queries doneby a few users. Of course, MySQL does not have any
348+
of thefeatures mentioned in the Features section above. We are
349+
builtfor reliability and features, though we continue to
350+
improveperformance in every release. There is an interesting
351+
Web pagecomparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at
350352
http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html
351353

352354
Reliability

‎doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
1+
]<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
22
<HTML>
33
<HEAD>
44
<METAname="generator"content="HTML Tidy, see www.w3.org">
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
1010
alink="#0000ff">
1111
<H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1>
1212

13-
<P>Last updated: Fri Oct 321:39:47 EDT 2003</P>
13+
<P>Last updated: Fri Oct 322:36:54 EDT 2003</P>
1414

1515
<P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<Ahref=
1616
"mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR>
@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ <H4><A name="1.14">1.14</A>) How does PostgreSQL compare to other
438438
open source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
439439
others. In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are
440440
faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a read/write query
441-
load. MySQL is faster for SELECT queries done by a few users. Of
442-
course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in the
441+
load. MySQL is faster forsimpleSELECT queries done by a few users.
442+
Ofcourse, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in the
443443
<I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and
444444
features, though we continue to improve performance in every
445445
release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp