Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit2c7887c

Browse files
committed
Fix Assert failure in WITH RECURSIVE UNION queries
If the non-recursive part of a recursive CTE ended up usingTTSOpsBufferHeapTuple as the table slot type, then a duplicate valuecould cause an Assert failure in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() whenchecking the hash table for the duplicate value. The expected slot typefor the deform step was TTSOpsMinimalTuple so the Assert failed when theTTSOpsBufferHeapTuple slot was used.This is a long-standing bug which we likely didn't notice because itseems much more likely that the non-recursive term would have requiredprojection and used a TTSOpsVirtual slot, which CheckOpSlotCompatibilityis ok with.There doesn't seem to be any harm done here other than the Assertfailure. Both TTSOpsMinimalTuple and TTSOpsBufferHeapTuple slot typesrequire tuple deformation, so the EEOP_*_FETCHSOME ExprState step wouldhave properly existed in the ExprState.The solution is to pass NULL for the ExecBuildGroupingEqual's 'lops'parameter. This means the ExprState's EEOP_*_FETCHSOME step won'texpect a fixed slot type. This makes CheckOpSlotCompatibility() happy asno checking is performed when the ExprEvalStep is not expecting a fixedslot type.Reported-by: Richard GuoReviewed-by: Tom LaneDiscussion:https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-8U9q2LAtf8+ghV11zeUReA3AmrYkxzBEv0vKnDxwkKA@mail.gmail.comBackpatch-through: 13, all supported versions
1 parent853cef0 commit2c7887c

File tree

3 files changed

+28
-2
lines changed

3 files changed

+28
-2
lines changed

‎src/backend/executor/execGrouping.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -225,9 +225,8 @@ BuildTupleHashTableExt(PlanState *parent,
225225
allow_jit=metacxt!=tablecxt;
226226

227227
/* build comparator for all columns */
228-
/* XXX: should we support non-minimal tuples for the inputslot? */
229228
hashtable->tab_eq_func=ExecBuildGroupingEqual(inputDesc,inputDesc,
230-
&TTSOpsMinimalTuple,&TTSOpsMinimalTuple,
229+
NULL,&TTSOpsMinimalTuple,
231230
numCols,
232231
keyColIdx,eqfuncoids,collations,
233232
allow_jit ?parent :NULL);

‎src/test/regress/expected/with.out

Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -627,6 +627,21 @@ SELECT t1.id, t2.path, t2 FROM t AS t1 JOIN t AS t2 ON
627627
16 | {3,7,11,16} | (16,"{3,7,11,16}")
628628
(16 rows)
629629

630+
CREATE TEMP TABLE duplicates (a INT NOT NULL);
631+
INSERT INTO duplicates VALUES(1), (1);
632+
-- Try out a recursive UNION case where the non-recursive part's table slot
633+
-- uses TTSOpsBufferHeapTuple and contains duplicate rows.
634+
WITH RECURSIVE cte (a) as (
635+
SELECT a FROM duplicates
636+
UNION
637+
SELECT a FROM cte
638+
)
639+
SELECT a FROM cte;
640+
a
641+
---
642+
1
643+
(1 row)
644+
630645
--
631646
-- test cycle detection
632647
--

‎src/test/regress/sql/with.sql

Lines changed: 12 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -339,6 +339,18 @@ UNION ALL
339339
SELECTt1.id,t2.path, t2FROM tAS t1JOIN tAS t2ON
340340
(t1.id=t2.id);
341341

342+
CREATE TEMP TABLE duplicates (aINTNOT NULL);
343+
INSERT INTO duplicatesVALUES(1), (1);
344+
345+
-- Try out a recursive UNION case where the non-recursive part's table slot
346+
-- uses TTSOpsBufferHeapTuple and contains duplicate rows.
347+
WITH RECURSIVE cte (a)as (
348+
SELECT aFROM duplicates
349+
UNION
350+
SELECT aFROM cte
351+
)
352+
SELECT aFROM cte;
353+
342354
--
343355
-- test cycle detection
344356
--

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp