Commit2877c67

committed

Fix bogus comment that claimed that the new BACKUP METHOD line in

backup_label was new in 9.0. Spotted by Fujii Masao.

1 parent3b3f093 commit2877c67Copy full SHA for 2877c67

File tree

-3

lines changed

-3

lines changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -9826,9 +9826,9 @@ read_backup_label(XLogRecPtr checkPointLoc, bool backupEndRequired)`
`9826`	`9826`	`(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),`
`9827`	`9827`	`errmsg("invalid data in file \"%s\"",BACKUP_LABEL_FILE)));`
`9828`	`9828`	`/*`
`9829`		`- * BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.0. Don'tcomplain if it doesn't exist,`
`9830`		`- *in case you're restoring from a backup taken with an 9.0 beta version`
`9831`		`- *that didn't emit it.`
	`9829`	`+ * BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.2. We can'trestore from an older backup`
	`9830`	`+ *anyway, but since the information on it is not strictly required, don't`
	`9831`	`+ *error out if it's missing for some reason.`
`9832`	`9832`	`*/`
`9833`	`9833`	`if (fscanf(lfp,"BACKUP METHOD: %19s",backuptype)==1)`
`9834`	`9834`	`{`

Comments

(0)