Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit0577821

Browse files
committed
Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In020235a I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums toallow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch thecorresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purposeof wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit forautovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, evenbefore020235a.Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.usBackpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
1 parent90f334d commit0577821

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

‎src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -185,15 +185,15 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
185185
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
186186
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP |RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
187187
},
188-
-1,100000000,2000000000
188+
-1,100000,2000000000
189189
},
190190
{
191191
{
192192
"autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age",
193193
"Multixact age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent multixact wraparound",
194194
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP |RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
195195
},
196-
-1,100000000,2000000000
196+
-1,10000,2000000000
197197
},
198198
{
199199
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp