Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix Makefile dist target#114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
vitcpp merged 1 commit intopostgrespro:masterfrompdowler:master
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

fix Makefile dist target#114

vitcpp merged 1 commit intopostgrespro:masterfrompdowler:master
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

pdowler
Copy link
Contributor

the sparse.c and sscan.c files are now committed in src dir

I use the dist target to create tarballs as part of building rpm packages.

the sparse.c and sscan.c files are now committed in src dir
Copy link
Contributor

@esabolesabol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This isn't a Makefile target that I use, so I trust you know what's best here.

@vitcpp
Copy link
Contributor

@pdowler There is intention to remove these files from the src directory and auto-generate it. Can such possible change break your rule?

@pdowler
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

When I added that rule back in 1.1.x those files were generated in the base dir and it was the quick and dirty way to make a src tarball... wasn't the right choice back then. Now, it looks like the C files are in src and committed to git so that is no longer needed.

If there is a change in future to not have those generated C files committed, then next time around I'll fix the rpm build setup instead so it can generate them correctly.

I don't know the pros and cons of those files being committed to git... probably wouldn't have been my choice (minimalist)., but I don't intend to change that.

esabol reacted with thumbs up emoji

@vitcppvitcpp merged commit597600e intopostgrespro:masterDec 12, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vitcppvitcppvitcpp approved these changes

@esabolesabolesabol approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
@pdowler@vitcpp@esabol

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp