Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commiteeb0b78

Browse files
committed
Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In020235a I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums toallow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch thecorresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purposeof wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit forautovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, evenbefore020235a.Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.usBackpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
1 parent3d8987f commiteeb0b78

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

‎src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
150150
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
151151
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP |RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
152152
},
153-
-1,100000000,2000000000
153+
-1,100000,2000000000
154154
},
155155
{
156156
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp