Commitcae459d

committed

Message style improvement

Backpatch the part ofedee0c6 that applies toa90bdd7, whichwas also backpatched. That way, the message is consistent in allbranches.

1 parent477830c commitcae459dCopy full SHA for cae459d

File tree

-2

lines changed

src
- backend/commands
  - tablecmds.c
- test/regress/expected
  - foreign_key.out

-2

lines changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -9310,7 +9310,7 @@ CloneFkReferencing(List **wqueue, Relation parentRel, Relation partRel)`
`9310`	`9310`	`if (fk->confrelid == RelationGetRelid(partRel))`
`9311`	`9311`	`ereport(ERROR,`
`9312`	`9312`	`(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),`
`9313`		`- errmsg("can't attach table \"%s\" as a partitionwhich is referenced by foreign key \"%s\"",`
	`9313`	`+ errmsg("cannot attach table \"%s\" as a partitionbecause it is referenced by foreign key \"%s\"",`
`9314`	`9314`	`RelationGetRelationName(partRel),`
`9315`	`9315`	`get_constraint_name(fk->conoid))));`
`9316`	`9316`

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1901,7 +1901,7 @@ ALTER TABLE fk_partitioned_fk ATTACH PARTITION fk_partitioned_fk_2`
`1901`	`1901`	`CREATE TABLE fk_partitioned_pk_6 (a int PRIMARY KEY);`
`1902`	`1902`	`CREATE TABLE fk_partitioned_fk_6 (a int REFERENCES fk_partitioned_pk_6) PARTITION BY LIST (a);`
`1903`	`1903`	`ALTER TABLE fk_partitioned_fk_6 ATTACH PARTITION fk_partitioned_pk_6 FOR VALUES IN (1);`
`1904`		`-ERROR:can't attach table "fk_partitioned_pk_6" as a partitionwhich is referenced by foreign key "fk_partitioned_fk_6_a_fkey"`
	`1904`	`+ERROR:cannot attach table "fk_partitioned_pk_6" as a partitionbecause it is referenced by foreign key "fk_partitioned_fk_6_a_fkey"`
`1905`	`1905`	`DROP TABLE fk_partitioned_pk_6, fk_partitioned_fk_6;`
`1906`	`1906`	`-- This case is similar to above, but the referenced relation is one level`
`1907`	`1907`	`-- lower in the hierarchy. This one fails in a different way as the above,`

Comments

(0)