Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Introduce Workflow#65

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
polobo wants to merge2 commits intopostgres:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
frompolobo:introduce-workflow
Draft

Conversation

polobo
Copy link
Contributor

This a much pared down version of PR#62 . Please review that message for the big picture of where all of this is going.

For this PR the goal is to start down the path to improved UX and CFBot integration through formalization of existing processes, exposing an API, and adding the Parked/Drafts commitfest status. See the commit messages for more details.

Introductory material to understand how the workflow operates andits terminology and concepts in the software development domaincompared to generic project managed.Includes a schedule.Also add a reference guide.
The Commitfest Workflow is a formalization and extension of the existingcommitfest-only protocol.  There is now some in-app documentation and theidea of moving patches to the "next CF" has begun being deprecated. Insteadthe UI provides the user valid choices on where to transition patches,which, with the introduction of the Drafts commitfest, is basically oneor the other.  Committers gain the ability to transition patches intoIn Progress if desired.  Patches within In Progress commitfests canbe moved into either Open or Drafts.  Begin enforcement of a maximumof one commifest in each of  Parked, Open, and In Progress.The workflow defines the drafts commitfest as lasting for one yearmatching up with the major release process.  Namely, once thecommifest leading up to feature freeze is In Progress a newDrafts commitfest should be created.With the workflow changes it is necessary for CFBot to be made awareof the specific commitfest ids that are active.  Provide a JSON APIfor this purpose to begin weaning CFBot off scraping html.The workflow in-app documentation includes a month-based scheduleshowing which commifests are active, and their names, in each month(among other related details).  Begin enforcing the existing rulethat future commitfests cannot have patches via triggers.  Futurework on the administrative and UX aspects of the CFApp likely willdo away with future commitfests altogether.  Thoughts on the topicare welcome in the GitHub issues.
operations = [
migrations.RunSQL(
"""
CREATE FUNCTION assert_poc_not_future_for_poc()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

As also said on the previous PR: Instead of messing around with triggers. We should simply remove the concept of future commitfests.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JelteFJelteFJelteF left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@polobo@JelteF

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp