- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1
tweaks to look and feel of autodoc#186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
My only concern is that the methods of |
Oh that's weird... when I was rendering this last night it wasn't doing this. |
I think there was some |
| figure.rst | ||
| .. autosummary:: | ||
| :toctree: generated/ | ||
| :template: trace.rst |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
@emmanuelle is this the line that's preventing theFigure methods from appearing? should we have aFigure-specific template that makes them appear so we can keep the rest of this formatting in place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Yes, I'm working on it, can I push a commit directly to your branch? We need the template to include the members and inherited-members (which was done in thefigure.rst file).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Awesome, and yes, feel free to push to this branch!
I just spent 2 hours trying all possible options with autoclass and autosummary... I pushed to#188 an alternative solution which exposes methods of Figure, and has everything in |
Here's a quick pass of suggested changes to the autodoc layout.