- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork235
-
Hi! Thanks very much! |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Replies: 1 comment 14 replies
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
I'm not sure I understand… Could you maybe detail your use case more, please? Shouldn't your dependent just implement a |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Yes, this should be doable with a reconcile precondition on |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
So the reconcilePrecondition is evaluated multiple times, not once right? I that case there I could check the status, not only the spec |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
Hmm, you probably shouldn't storeexternal state in the status… Seehttps://javaoperatorsdk.io/docs/dependent-resources#external-state-tracking-dependent-resources (but maybe that's not what you're doing). |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Oh sure, I mean I could check if dependent resource status has some expected status so the condition is true ir false |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I mean it will be triggered again (the whole reconiliation) anyway if some of other resources (B,C) changes. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.