NotificationsYou must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork11.9k
Star31.1k

BUG: Use 'll' as the default length specifier for long long.#5212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merged

juliantaylor merged 1 commit intonumpy:masterfromcharris:fix-long-long-fmt

Oct 21, 2014

Merged

BUG: Use 'll' as the default length specifier for long long.#5212

juliantaylor merged 1 commit intonumpy:masterfromcharris:fix-long-long-fmt

Oct 21, 2014

Conversation

Copy link

Member

charris commentedOct 21, 2014

The previous default was 'L', which seems gcc specific, whereas
'll' is the now recognized standard and is also accepted by gcc.

Closes#5027.

Rebased for backport to 1.9.x.

BUG: Use 'll' as the default length specifier for long long.

0ddb8e3

The previous default was 'L', which seems gcc specific, whereas'll' is the now recognized standard and is also accepted by gcc.Closesnumpy#5027.

charris added this to the1.9.1 milestone

Oct 21, 2014

Copy link

Contributor

juliantaylor commentedOct 21, 2014

thanks, merging to both branches

juliantaylor added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 21, 2014

Merge pull request#5212from charris/fix-long-long-fmt

0e091af

BUG: Use 'll' as the default length specifier for long long.

juliantaylor merged commit0e091af intonumpy:master

Oct 21, 2014

juliantaylor added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 21, 2014

Merge pull request#5212from charris/fix-long-long-fmt

ddb5e79

BUG: Use 'll' as the default length specifier for long long.

Copy link

MemberAuthor

charris commentedOct 21, 2014

I'd guess this is actuallylibc specific, so we should keep an eye on it. Should also work on MSVC since at least 2005, but I left the MS specific versions.

Copy link

Contributor

juliantaylor commentedOct 21, 2014

oldest (and newest) VC possible is "luckily" 2008 as thats what python2.7 uses.
I'd be surprised if someone really would want to compile its own stack with something even older