Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fix mlab.rec_join.#6577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
tacaswell merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:masterfromanntzer:fix-mlab-rec-join
Jun 19, 2016
Merged

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

examples/misc/rec_lab_demo.py was broken on Python3.

Any plans to just deprecate most ofmlab? I can see why it's there but nowadayspandas and friends are much more appropriate for this kind of stuff.

`examples/misc/rec_lab_demo.py` was broken on Python3.
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

Yes, but we do not have any idea what people are actually using. For example the LIGO notebooks used some stuff from mlab (the power spectrum).

@tacaswelltacaswell added this to the2.0.1 (next bug fix release) milestoneJun 13, 2016
@anntzer
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Well, won't a standard deprecation cycle be enough?

@WeatherGod
Copy link
Member

This stuff has been in matplotlib for avery long time. We would need a
few cycles for deprecation, and we should be providing clear replacements
in the deprecation notes.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Antony Leenotifications@github.com
wrote:

Well, won't a standard deprecation cycle be enough?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#6577 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AARy-OnE_tTXl7CfRMcgOvtA0WLSYpW0ks5qLaBMgaJpZM4Iz_V2
.

@anntzer
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I certainly understand, and wouldn't have suggested it if I didn't find parts of the code that are broken. The alternative would be to improve the coverage, which is so-so right now (this is actually the kind of code for which high coverage could be achieved).

@tacaswelltacaswell merged commit0d33b1f intomatplotlib:masterJun 19, 2016
@anntzeranntzer deleted the fix-mlab-rec-join branchJune 20, 2016 01:01
@QuLogic
Copy link
Member

Indirectly backported to v2.x ascbec32b via#6868.

@anntzeranntzer mentioned this pull requestOct 16, 2016
@QuLogicQuLogic modified the milestones:2.0.1 (next bug fix release),2.0 (style change major release)Dec 7, 2016
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
@anntzer@tacaswell@WeatherGod@QuLogic@mdboom

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp