Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork8.1k
Refresh pgf baseline images.#5727
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
mdboom commentedDec 23, 2015
@pwuertz may want to double check these, but in principle it seems fine to me. |
jenshnielsen commentedDec 23, 2015
We probably want to hold this up until#5724 is merged since that probably changes pgf_rcupdate2.pdf again |
jenshnielsen commentedDec 23, 2015
This should probably be backported to 2.x? |
tacaswell commentedJan 3, 2016
maybe waiting on#5772 |
pwuertz commentedJan 4, 2016
Looks reasonable, and reminds me to check the test results from time to time. Some small details might be worth checking out (not related to this PR). |
jenshnielsen commentedJan 4, 2016
@pwuertz The tests should really be run on Travis. If I remember correctly the reason they are not is that the Travis images are based on Ubuntu 12.04 which ships a too old version of texlive (xetex). I tried switching to the new images in#5730 unfortunately that does not work with the Travis cache feature that we use. |
pwuertz commentedJan 4, 2016
Yea, the issue was that the setup for running the PGF tests was too heavy / uncommon so we decided to exclude them from the default set of tests. I guess this was even before we had a CI system / Travis. Could be possible to include the tests in such a controlled environment, but I don't know about the cache feature you mentioned. |
b72aced todd2e285Comparejenshnielsen commentedJan 4, 2016
The cache feature is not related to the pgf backend. It's there such that we don't have to build Numpy etc from scratch every time we run the tests. Unfortunatly it's not available on the Ubuntu 14.04 images. |
jenshnielsen commentedJan 4, 2016
I tried installing the pgf and zetex packages on this Travis node type unfortunately now a different test is failing (test_pdflatex) I guess this is due to an out of date version of texlive |
dd2e285 to3325a5aComparejenshnielsen commentedJan 15, 2016
I have installed the dependencies on Travis and refreshed all images. Lets hope that is enough to get the tests to pass. |
jenshnielsen commentedJan 15, 2016
jenshnielsen commentedJan 16, 2016
From looking at the tests on a Ubuntu 12.04 image the main reason for the needed tolerance seems to be the fonts selected. The 2 pdflatex test are different do to a different font whereas the xelatex one mainly seems to be due to different kerneling which may or may not be due to the font. |
92bd2cc to988ff34Compare988ff34 to336a8fdComparejenshnielsen commentedFeb 6, 2016
Regenerated the images on top of the new master. Still need to fix the font selection. The links below show the changes since github still does not due rich diffs for pdfs
|
8095340 tod1045a9Comparejenshnielsen commentedFeb 6, 2016
By installing cm-super I should have been able to lover the diffs for two more tests to zero. Unfortunatly cm-super is not currently allowed on Travis. I will take care of that. The final test still needs a diff of 4 to pass. From manual comparison it seems like it's only a text kerning issue but inspecting the pdf files seems to indicate that they are using different fonts. |
0da2fff to495540fCompareThese have changed due to the 2.x work on ticks and changes of dpi but was notcaught since travis does not run the pgf tests
495540f toe2c8154Comparejenshnielsen commentedFeb 9, 2016
This should finally be working. I have reduced all the tolerances to 0 apart from rc_update1 (see above) I have rebased the changed on top of the now merged style changes pr#5774 (the pgf tests do not use the classic style) It is useful to verify the changes by comparing the pdf links above but I think they make sense. |
TST: Refresh pgf baseline images.
tacaswell commentedFeb 16, 2016
Should this be backported to 2.x? |
jenshnielsen commentedFeb 16, 2016
Yes I will do that as a pr |
TST: Refresh pgf baseline images.
Backport Refresh pgf baseline images.#5727
These have changed due to the 2.x work on ticks and changes of dpi but was not caught since travis does not run the pgf tests. I think the changes are ok and makes sense