Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork8.1k
Final decxx corrections to PR #3723#3744
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
mdboom commentedNov 3, 2014
Very nice. I'm not sure why Travis-CI hasn't come along and tested this yet... I'll look into that. |
mdboom commentedNov 3, 2014
@tacaswell: Any thoughts about why Travis-CI hasn't picked this up, and how to force it? I don't know if I've seen this happen before. |
jenshnielsen commentedNov 3, 2014
@mdboom I have seen that happen before. I guess it happens because the webhook somehow doesn't reach Travis. The only way I know is to push against the branch again. The Jenkins plugin that we use for other projects has the ability to trigger on strings in the comments but Travis don't seem to allow this. |
jenshnielsen commentedNov 3, 2014
There don't seem to be a good waytravis-ci/travis-ci#895 |
6e10892 tod271736Compareianthomas23 commentedNov 3, 2014
@mdboom,@jenshnielsen: I've just forced a rebase and travis seems to have started, |
mdboom commentedNov 3, 2014
Ok -- in any event, we have Travis passing now, and this looks good to me on reading... so merging... Nice to have PyCXX gone! |
Final decxx corrections to PR#3723
Corrections to PR#3723, the removal of PyCXX from the _tri module. I've made the four requested changes. Using the new C++ array_view classes has improved the code, but the changes pervade all three of the C++ files making it hard to review. However, all tri tests pass, the examples produce the same output, and there are no memory leaks in either.