Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork7.9k
addressing issue #29156, converted ps to array before slicing#29175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Thank you for opening your first PR into Matplotlib!
If you have not heard from us in a week or so, please leave a new comment below and that should bring it to our attention. Most of our reviewers are volunteers and sometimes things fall through the cracks.
You can also join uson gitter for real-time discussion.
For details on testing, writing docs, and our review process, please seethe developer guide
We strive to be a welcoming and open project. Please follow ourCode of Conduct.
# Following code is an example taken from | ||
# https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18897786/transparency-for-poly3dcollection-plot-in-matplotlib | ||
# and modified to test _generate_normals function |
scottshambaughNov 23, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
To the other devs, can we include stack overflow code directly like this? It's not clear to me if the CC BY-SA license for stack overflow posts is compatible with matplotlib's license.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I think a better test is the one in the issue, with a note that it is a smoke test and a reference to the issue. The added test is not really testing any rendering aspects anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Better in the sense that we do not have to worry about the SE-connection and that the SE-test doesn't really add anything more, just more complicated code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Hello, can you elaborate a bit more about the SE-connection and SE-test? I'm not sure what you're referring to. I have updated the test using the one in the original issue. I followed similar format as the other smoke test in the file.
57f7fdf
intomatplotlib:v3.9.xUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
scottshambaugh commentedDec 11, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Whoops, this should have gone into the |
Thank you@vicliu2001 for the PR, and congratulations on your first contribution to matplotlib! We hope to see more of you! |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR summary
closes issue#29156
PR checklist