Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork7.9k
PoC: Document each rcParam individually#28930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Taking cues from the math symbol table, this adds a directive togenerate a listing from the `RcParams` dictionary, with types taken fromthe validators (partially complete), though there could perhaps be otherways to implement it. Then the `rc` role is updated to point to theseindividual anchors.We also have nowhere to put the documentation for each one yet, so theactual information is all just stubs.
I believe we eventually should have a function-based/declarative approach to specifying rcParams, similar to e.g.
This would bind all relevant information together and make it easy to generate documentation. A minor obstacle would be to generate a reasonably formatted default |
PR summary
Taking cues from the math symbol table, this adds a directive to generate a listing from the
RcParams
dictionary, with types taken from the validators (partially complete), though there could perhaps be other ways to implement it. Then therc
role is updated to point to these individual anchors.We also have nowhere to put the documentation for each one yet, so the actual information is all just stubs. This would be the main obstacle to completing this change.
PR checklist