Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork7.9k
Correct Unicode for [lg]napprox#26010
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Do we want to add a release not to make people aware that this was incorrect and is now fixed, or is it just a fix of incorrect behavior that does not need mention.
I think that if anything, one can add a note to#25933 stating that some relational operators have been added and corrected? |
PR summary
While checking the output of#25933 I realized that these two used the wrong code point (prec/succnapprox). (Visible in the current documentation as well.)
See the resulting docs, but to confirm that these are the correct ones:https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+2A89https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+2A8A
PR checklist