What sort of feedback would be helpful at this stage?

I don't think I've added that much right now to have any suggestions particularly, but just in general, is the type of animation okay for the plots? I was thinking to keep them very simple and distraction-free so as to focus more on the process of animating rather than the data that it animates.

Yeah if anything I'd suggest going even simpler and just using sin/cos/unit circle so you can remove the data generation functions

@story645 can you take a look at this? I think I have this as a first draft and would appreciate feedback! I had a question too, actually. I'm not sure why the Lines2D animation is not showing up correctly. I tried saving it locally as .html and that seems to be working fine but for some reason, it isn't working correctly in the docs.

@story645 thanks for the feedback! I've updated most of the things. Let me know if there are more things to change :)

Something's still wrong with the line plot though. Working on it.

Okay, the line plot seems to be working now. For some reason, adding aninit_func resolved the issue where it was showing just the final frame. Maybe it is because if there's no function, it just starts out with the final frame? I don't know, just speculating. I'm not sure if this would be the ideal solution for it either. Let me know if there's a better way to resolve this. Thanks!

Alternatively, I was able to remove the init by pulling the axes setting outside the initax.set(ylim=(-1.1, 1.1), xlim=(0, 5))

I had the same thing before but what this led to was that the animation used to get stuck at the last frame after building the docs. This did not happen if I just saved the animation as.html

I changed it to the simple example you linked and that works for some reason, so let me put that instead!

Forgot that the decay example doesn't have explicit frames but the docs save out to 100 and that might be why things are inconsistent.

Ah okay. Yeah, that might be the case. Thanks for that!

@story645 I changed to an example that shows a 2d gaussian pdf with increasing covariance (kind of a raindrop effect). I feel that this shows the changes in the image in a better way and also allows the example to not be extremely convoluted. This also allows reusing the same in ArtistAnimation. Let me know, thanks!

Wondering if for the artist animation you should add an additional artist to each list? Maybe a marker that moves across the page or something?

Hey folks, since this is documentation my plan is that if there are no reviews over the weekend then I'll merge Monday if there are no objections.

Thanks@QuLogic! That should fix all of the comments.

I squash merged as it's unlikely we need all 29 commits preserved.