Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Backport PR #12809 on branch v2.2.x (Fix TypeError when calculating tick_values)#12811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

meeseeksmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Backport PR#12809: Fix TypeError when calculating tick_values

@lumberbot-applumberbot-appbot added this to thev2.2.4 milestoneNov 15, 2018
@timhoffm
Copy link
Member

CI fails due to

E               _pytest.warning_types.RemovedInPytest4Warning: MarkInfo objects are deprecated as they contain merged marks which are hard to deal with correctly.E               Please use node.get_closest_marker(name) or node.iter_markers(name).E               Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/mark.html#updating-code

Solution: Either pin pytest<3.8 or backport#12154.

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

power cycled to re-run now that pytest pinning is merged.

@NelleVNelleV closed thisJan 18, 2019
@NelleVNelleV reopened thisJan 18, 2019
@ArchangeGabriel
Copy link
Contributor

@NelleV For the CI to pass (outside of MacOS that is just broken),#13181 must be merged first (or alternatively just part of it + alternative pinning of some deps).

@NelleV
Copy link
Member

@ArchangeGabriel there's actually two different problem right now. Tom and I have fixed them in a PR.

@ArchangeGabriel
Copy link
Contributor

@NelleV I think you fixed 3.0.x branch (PR#13216), but this is for 2.2.x.

@ArchangeGabriel
Copy link
Contributor

This can be cycled again, CI should now pass. :)

@ArchangeGabriel
Copy link
Contributor

I don’t know what the coverage failure means, but outside from that all other CIs now pass.

@QuLogicQuLogic merged commit1fc42b3 intomatplotlib:v2.2.xJan 22, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@NelleVNelleVNelleV approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.2.4
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
@meeseeksmachine@timhoffm@tacaswell@ArchangeGabriel@NelleV@QuLogic

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp