Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork7.9k
Backport PR #12394 on branch v3.0.x (DOC: fix CL tutorial to give same output from saved file and example)#12412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
…t from saved file and example
I'll close this - I don't think it is urgent need of backporting. Sorry - I find the 3.0.0-doc branch confusing so I probably mis-milestoned... |
Oh yes, confusing indeed. I thought everything that concerns the current documentation should go in that branch, such that the online docs can be updated more frequently than library releases? |
I guess thats correct.... Sorry I hadn't realized you'd milestoned it. We can re-open. Doesn't hurt anything... |
Oh, but now I'm even more confused. This is a backport PR for the I think it would be helpful if someone could extend thebranches and backports section a bit concerning this topic. |
jklymak commentedOct 5, 2018 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
That’s what confused me. But I think it’s right. We want future releases to have 3.0.0 changes. |
Backport PR#12394: DOC: fix CL tutorial to give same output from saved file and example