Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork7.9k
Alternate implementation of lazy ticks.#10302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
e2c7538
toce2ddee
CompareI'm not going to merge in case@efiring or@tacaswell want to have a look.... |
ooops, now there is a conflict. Probably w/ the other tick change? |
Speeds up creation of 10x10 subplots ~4-fold (from 2.7s to 0.7s).
rebased |
@timhoffm congrats on getting your commit bit, btw |
@timhoffm Yes, welcome! Though I think out of an abundance of caution we make sure (most of) the tests pass before committing 😉 Maybe OK in this case, as the pre-rebase passed, but... |
Thanks.@jklymak also thanks for the advice. I will wait next time. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Speeds up creation of 10x10 subplots ~4-fold (from 2.7s to 0.7s for me).
I think this is closer than#9727 to being backcompatible, and also simpler if you understand how descriptors work. attn@timhoffm, obviously the credits of the idea go to him.
Milestoned to 2.2 to match#9727.
PR Summary
PR Checklist