@jklymak Left-where? If you leave the height, but just left-align, long numbers clash with the "p".

When moving down further, short versions look a bit lost:

Oops, sorry, I didn't see how you were anchoring. If at all humanly possible I'd anchor below the second "t" or second "l". If thats too hard (sorry my css/html is a bit rusty), what you have is fine. After all folks can expect a few rough edges if they look at the Master version of the docs.

With a bit more effort, one could also make the text background opaque, so that it's more readable but cuts the polar plot. Note that long version strings are restricted to development versions anyway.

I won't merge because I don't think the header is a "minor" documentation change, butI like the change.

I agree with right alignment, though maybe 0.5 or even 0.25 em lower just to make the dot of the i not overlap the circle.

I don't really think there's any reason for the given header height. When I CSS-ified the GitHub banner, that's just the size that came out of the generator and matched the old image. I'm not sure one or the other is "right" in that regard.

If we do this we should probably regenerate old versions of the docs as well (at least 2.0 and 1.5) and re-publish those as well (I'll take care of that and all of the backporting and rebuilding).