Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[AMDGPU] Fix sgpr to vreg_1 copy analysis#149181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
arsenm merged 4 commits intollvm:mainfromjtuyls:fix-vreg1-copy
Jul 18, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jtuyls
Copy link
Contributor

The added test is reduced from a kernel function that hits the assertion:

llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp:3624: const llvm::TargetRegisterClass* llvm::SIRegisterInfo::getEquivalentSGPRClass(const llvm::TargetRegisterClass*) const: Assertion `SRC && "Invalid register class size"' failed.

This happens because the vgpr register size is 1 bit and this is not supported in getEquivalentSGPRClass. This PR fixes it by moving tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy behind the isSGPRToVGPRCopy check. This seems sensible as the same is done at other places in this file where tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy is called:

Additionally, this fix seems to work for the kernel in which I hit this. However, let me know if this is not the correct approach.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu

Author: Jorn Tuyls (jtuyls)

Changes

The added test is reduced from a kernel function that hits the assertion:

llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp:3624: const llvm::TargetRegisterClass* llvm::SIRegisterInfo::getEquivalentSGPRClass(const llvm::TargetRegisterClass*) const: Assertion `SRC && "Invalid register class size"' failed.

This happens because the vgpr register size is 1 bit and this is not supported in getEquivalentSGPRClass. This PR fixes it by moving tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy behind the isSGPRToVGPRCopy check. This seems sensible as the same is done at other places in this file where tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy is called:

Additionally, this fix seems to work for the kernel in which I hit this. However, let me know if this is not the correct approach.


Full diff:https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149181.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFixSGPRCopies.cpp (+12-7)
  • (added) llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sgpr-to-vreg1-copy.mir (+31)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFixSGPRCopies.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFixSGPRCopies.cppindex 9b5a46395695d..343d203cbe0de 100644--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFixSGPRCopies.cpp+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFixSGPRCopies.cpp@@ -946,13 +946,18 @@ void SIFixSGPRCopies::analyzeVGPRToSGPRCopy(MachineInstr* MI) {      // Copies and REG_SEQUENCE do not contribute to the final assembly     // So, skip them but take care of the SGPR to VGPR copies bookkeeping.-    if (Inst->isCopy() || Inst->isRegSequence()) {-      if (TRI->isVGPR(*MRI, Inst->getOperand(0).getReg())) {-        if (!Inst->isCopy() ||-            !tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy(*Inst, TRI, TII)) {-          Info.NumSVCopies++;-          continue;-        }+    if (Inst->isRegSequence() &&+        TRI->isVGPR(*MRI, Inst->getOperand(0).getReg())) {+      Info.NumSVCopies++;+      continue;+    }+    if (Inst->isCopy()) {+      const TargetRegisterClass *SrcRC, *DstRC;+      std::tie(SrcRC, DstRC) = getCopyRegClasses(*Inst, *TRI, *MRI);+      if (isSGPRToVGPRCopy(SrcRC, DstRC, *TRI) &&+          !tryChangeVGPRtoSGPRinCopy(*Inst, TRI, TII)) {+        Info.NumSVCopies++;+        continue;       }     }diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sgpr-to-vreg1-copy.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sgpr-to-vreg1-copy.mirnew file mode 100644index 0000000000000..2daea2b2eeb74--- /dev/null+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sgpr-to-vreg1-copy.mir@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@+# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -run-pass si-fix-sgpr-copies -verify-machineinstrs -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GCN %s++---+name:            copy_to_vreg_1+tracksRegLiveness: true+body:             |+  ; GCN-LABEL: name: copy_to_vreg_1+  ; GCN: bb.0:+  ; GCN-NEXT:   successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)+  ; GCN-NEXT:   liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1+  ; GCN-NEXT: {{  $}}+  ; GCN-NEXT:   [[V_CVT_U32_F32_e64:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = nofpexcept V_CVT_U32_F32_e64 0, killed $vgpr0, 0, 0, implicit $mode, implicit $exec+  ; GCN-NEXT:   [[IMPLICIT_DEF:%[0-9]+]]:sreg_32 = IMPLICIT_DEF+  ; GCN-NEXT:   [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr1+  ; GCN-NEXT:   [[V_CMP_GT_U32_e64:%[0-9]+]]:sreg_64_xexec = samesign V_CMP_GT_U32_e64 [[V_CVT_U32_F32_e64]], killed [[COPY1]], implicit $exec+  ; GCN-NEXT:   [[VREG1:%[0-9]+]]:vreg_1 = COPY [[V_CMP_GT_U32_e64]]+  ; GCN-NEXT: {{  $}}+  ; GCN-NEXT: bb.1:+  ; GCN-NEXT:   S_ENDPGM 0+  bb.0:+    liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1+      %0:vgpr_32 = nofpexcept V_CVT_U32_F32_e64 0, killed $vgpr0, 0, 0, implicit $mode, implicit $exec+      %1:sreg_32 = COPY %0:vgpr_32+      %2:sreg_32 = COPY $vgpr1+      samesign S_CMP_GT_U32 %1:sreg_32, killed %2:sreg_32, implicit-def $scc+      %3:sreg_64 = COPY $scc+      %4:vreg_1 = COPY %3:sreg_64++  bb.1:+      S_ENDPGM 0+...

@github-actionsGitHub Actions
Copy link

⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute to the repo.
Please turn offKeep my email addresses private setting in your account.
SeeLLVM Developer Policy andLLVM Discourse for more information.

@jtuyls
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Tagging a couple of people that did recent reviews of related logic:@Sisyph@arsenm@jayfoad, could I get some help with a review?

Copy link
Contributor

@arsenmarsenm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Can you add an IR testcase too

@jtuyls
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@arsenm I added an LLVM IR testcase.

; GCN-NEXT: .LBB0_8: ; %DummyReturnBlock
; GCN-NEXT: s_endpgm
._crit_edge:
%1 = tail call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Should use named values in tests

@arsenm
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute to the repo. Please turn offKeep my email addresses private setting in your account. SeeLLVM Developer Policy andLLVM Discourse for more information.

Also should fix this

@arsenmarsenm merged commit03fe1a4 intollvm:mainJul 18, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@arsenmarsenmarsenm approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
@jtuyls@llvmbot@arsenm

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp