Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Updating headers + tracing project CTAs#892

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
tanushree-sharma wants to merge3 commits intomain
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromheaders-change

Conversation

tanushree-sharma
Copy link
Contributor

@tanushree-sharmatanushree-sharma commentedJul 8, 2025
edited
Loading

Docs updates:

- [x] Dashboards- [x] Alerts Creating- [ ] New automation – needs screenshots once bugs are fixed- [x] New evaluator – DONE for online evaluators. need to check offline- [x] New alert Viewing - [x] evaluators- [x] automations - [ ] Redo screenshots of datasets page ?- [ ] Redo screenshots of prompts page ?- [ ] Update this page https://docs.smith.langchain.com/evaluation/how_to_guides/bind_evaluator_to_dataset which is partly covered in this PR https://github.com/langchain-ai/langsmith-docs/pull/837```

@vercelVercel
Copy link

vercelbot commentedJul 8, 2025
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more aboutVercel for Git ↗︎

NameStatusPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
langsmith-docs✅ Ready (Inspect)Visit Preview💬Add feedbackJul 8, 2025 9:50pm

Copy link
Contributor

@katmaybkatmayb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Hey@tanushree-sharma, I left some brief comments, I don't have access to the UI so I haven't been able to cross-check things.


We navigate to `Projects` -> `<your project name>`, click the data retention drop down, and modify it to base retention. As
with the organization level setting, this will only affect retention (and pricing) for traces going forward.
Navigate to **Projects** > **_Your project name_** > Select **Retention** and modify the default rentetion of the project to **Base**. This will only affect retention (and pricing) for **traces going forward**.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
Navigate to**Projects** >**_Your project name_** > Select**Retention** and modify the defaultrentetion of the project to**Base**. This will only affect retention (and pricing) for**traces going forward**.
Navigate to**Projects** >**_Your project name_** > Select**Retention** and modify the defaultretention of the project to**Base**. This will only affect retention (and pricing) for**traces going forward**.

Comment on lines +99 to 100
Navigate to the `Usage configuration` tab, and look at our organization level retention settings. Modifying this setting affects all **new projects** that are
created going forward in all workspaces in our org.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
Navigate to the`Usage configuration` tab, and look at our organization level retention settings. Modifying this setting affects all**new projects** that are
created going forward in all workspaces in our org.
Navigate to the`Usage configuration` tab to review the organization level retention settings. Modifying this setting will affect all**new projects** that are created in all workspaces in the organization.

created going forward in all workspaces in our org.

:::note
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to Extended. Organizations created after June 3rd
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to Extended. Organizations created after June 3rd, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to Extended. Organizations created after June 3rd, 2024
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to**Extended**. Organizations created after June 3rd, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

What do you think about bolding the retention policy names in the UI?

created going forward in all workspaces in our org.

:::note
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to Extended. Organizations created after June 3rd
For backwards compatibility, older organizations may have this defaulted to Extended. Organizations created after June 3rd, 2024
have this defaulted to Base.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
have this defaulted to Base.
have this defaulted to**Base**.


We navigate to `Projects` -> `<your project name>`, click the data retention drop down, and modify it to base retention. As
with the organization level setting, this will only affect retention (and pricing) for traces going forward.
Navigate to **Projects** > **_Your project name_** > Select **Retention** and modify the default rentetion of the project to **Base**. This will only affect retention (and pricing) for **traces going forward**.

![](./static/p1projectretention.png)

### Keep around a percentage of traces for extended data retention
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

What do you think about:

Apply extended data retention to a percentage of traces

Or, something similar?

Comment on lines +131 to +132
When an automation rule matches any [run](/observability/concepts#runs) within a [trace](/observability/concepts#traces), the all runs within the trace are upgraded to be retained for 400 days.
:::
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Should this say "... then all runs within.."

#### 3. Configure your rule
#### 1. Navigate to online evaluators

Head to the **Tracing Projects** tab and select a tracing project. Click on **+ New** in the top right corner the tracing projectpage, then click on **New Evaluator**.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
Head to the**Tracing Projects** tab and select a tracing project. Click on**+ New** in the top right corner the tracingprojectpage, then click on**New Evaluator**.
Head to the**Tracing Projects** tab and select a tracing project. Click on**+ New** in the top right cornerofthe tracingproject page, then click on**New Evaluator**.

Comment on lines +40 to +41
- Runs where a [user left feedback](/evaluation/how_to_guides/attach_user_feedback) indicating he response was unsatisfactory
- Runs that invoke a specific tool call. See [filtering for tool calls](//observability/how_to_guides/filter_traces_in_application#example-filtering-for-tool-calls) for more information
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
- Runs where a[user left feedback](/evaluation/how_to_guides/attach_user_feedback) indicatinghe response was unsatisfactory
- Runs that invoke a specific tool call. See[filtering for tool calls](//observability/how_to_guides/filter_traces_in_application#example-filtering-for-tool-calls) for more information
- Runs where a[user left feedback](/evaluation/how_to_guides/attach_user_feedback) indicatingthe response was unsatisfactory.
- Runs that invoke a specific tool call. See[filtering for tool calls](//observability/how_to_guides/filter_traces_in_application#example-filtering-for-tool-calls) for more information.

- Runs that invoke a specific tool call. See [filtering for tool calls](//observability/how_to_guides/filter_traces_in_application#example-filtering-for-tool-calls) for more information
- Runs that match a particular piece of metadata (eg. if you log traces with a plan_type and only want to run evaluations on traces from your enterprise customers). See [adding metadata to your traces](/observability/how_to_guides/add_metadata_tags) for more information.

Filters on evaluators work the same way as filters applied traces in the project. For more information on filters, you can refer to [this guide](./filter_traces_in_application).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
Filters on evaluators work the same way as filters applied traces in the project. For more information on filters, you can refer to[this guide](./filter_traces_in_application).
Filters on evaluators work the same way as filters appliedtotraces in the project. For more information on filters, you can refer to[this guide](./filter_traces_in_application).

### Configure a LLM-as-a-judge online evaluator

View this guide to configure on configuring an [LLM-as-a-judge evaluator](/evaluation/how_to_guides/llm_as_judge).
View this guide to configure on configuring an [LLM-as-a-judge evaluator](/evaluation/how_to_guides/llm_as_judge?mode=ui).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Suggested change
View this guide to configureon configuringan[LLM-as-a-judge evaluator](/evaluation/how_to_guides/llm_as_judge?mode=ui).
View this guide to configure an[LLM-as-a-judge evaluator](/evaluation/how_to_guides/llm_as_judge?mode=ui).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@katmaybkatmaybkatmayb left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@tanushree-sharma@katmayb

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp