- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork3.4k
fix: prioritize current-context based on file order#2386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Welcome@hhk7734! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR isNOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by:hhk7734 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be foundhere. Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-triage-robot commentedJul 13, 2025
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience atkubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
(?)
What this PR does / why we need it:
kubectl config current-context
command retrieves the current-context from the first file with a non-empty value when multiple files are provided. In contrast,config.list_kube_config_contexts() returns the current-context from the last file with a value. Since developers are likely to expect the behavior aligned withkubectl
, I created this PR to adjust the priority.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
I'm guessing thathttps://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/blob/18a1faa115ed571de5af3e8f0f9c02973769ceb3/tools/clientcmd/loader.go#L246-L273 is relevant, and client-go probably works the same way.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: