I think the 5.12 was also piked in this case was to have a consistent Qt version across our binaries. Downgrading it here to 5.9.7 again would mean that our rpms run with5.9.7 and all other binaries with5.12. I'm not sure that this is a good idea to be honest.

Also, the rpm will be discontinued with the next minor release so we should be looking for alternatives for you here. Does the AppImage work for you or do you have the same problem with dependencies?

Appimage requires each user to install a 30 MB file, whereas rpm provide a consistent shared resources for all our users across all our machines of ~6 MB...

Finally the official 1.10.0 appimage is not working on CentOS-7:

[tru@elitebook840g3 Downloads]$ ./ksnip-1.10.0-x86_64.AppImage./ksnip-1.10.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /tmp/.mount_ksnip-UXBGGd/usr/bin/../lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2)./ksnip-1.10.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /tmp/.mount_ksnip-UXBGGd/usr/bin/../lib/libsystemd.so.0)./ksnip-1.10.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /tmp/.mount_ksnip-UXBGGd/usr/bin/../lib/libsystemd.so.0)./ksnip-1.10.0-x86_64.AppImage: /lib64/libgpg-error.so.0: no version information available (required by /tmp/.mount_ksnip-UXBGGd/usr/bin/../lib/libgcrypt.so.20)[tru@elitebook840g3 Downloads]$ rpm -q glibcglibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.i686

I see. Ok, as CentOS has such a long support, let's do this but after1.11.0 there will be no rpm anymore, you are probably going to stuck with1.10.X

Thanks for considering that request! ksnip 1.10.x and with only bug fix is perfect as C7 eol is june 2024https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product.