Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Added extra information and user-action summaries to 7 migration docs.#6850

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
jtpio merged 8 commits intojupyter:mainfromericsnekbytes:migrate_to_7_updates
Apr 27, 2023

Conversation

@ericsnekbytes
Copy link
Collaborator

@ericsnekbytesericsnekbytes commentedApr 24, 2023
edited
Loading

See#6851, this PR adds extra information to the migrate_to_notebook7 doc:

  • A summary of user-actions to take
  • Additional context
  • Formatting/document structure updates

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branchericsnekbytes/notebook/migrate_to_7_updates

@ericsnekbytesericsnekbytes marked this pull request as ready for reviewApril 24, 2023 14:52
@ericsnekbytesericsnekbytes changed the title(DRAFT) Added extra information and user-action summaries to 7 migration docs.Added extra information and user-action summaries to 7 migration docs.Apr 24, 2023
@echarles
Copy link
Member

Thx@ericsnekbytes I have gone across your changes and they make sense to me.

Copy link
Member

@jtpiojtpio left a comment
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for taking the time to improve the documentation.

Left a couple of comments.


- If you NEED to maintain compatibility with the Classic Notebook for extensions
or other customizations that are critical to your workflows, you can switch to
[nbclassic], the new home for users who need to maintain compatibility with the
Copy link
Member

@jtpiojtpioApr 25, 2023
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The "new home" and "maintain" words in this sentence give the somewhat misleading idea that nbclassic will be maintained in the long run?

NBClassic is supposed to help with the transition to Notebook 7, but shouldn't be seen as an "alternative" to Notebook 7 long term.

Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Yeah it's a subtle thing to communicate. We want people who need it to know it's there and to use it, without giving the impression it's a permanent thing. I'll add a bit/re-work to add some clarity. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I posted a comment in the team compass issue to see if the EC can provide guidance for the documentation as well, since they will be looking at the blog post:jupyter/notebook-team-compass#24 (comment)

ericsnekbytes reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I have updated this portion with a recent commit, and we can modify as needed after the EC takes a look.

[nbclassic], the new home for users who need to maintain compatibility with the
old notebook interface

##Why things are changing
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Maybe something like the following?

Suggested change
##Whythings are changing
##Whya new major version?

Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I think this one is worth keeping, because it simplifies the language and reduces jargon (related to semantic versioning / "major version", which not everyone is going to know about). Maybe there's a plain-language compromise, like "Why the big version change?" Is it the "major-version-number-is-being-incremented-to-7" idea that you want to communicate here?

Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

@ericsnekbytesericsnekbytesApr 26, 2023
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@jtpio Is "Why the big version change?" good? Edit: I've just pushed that, let me know if there's anything else.

Copy link
Member

@jtpiojtpioApr 27, 2023
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

"big" sounds ambiguous: what does big mean?

If this is because of the word "major" then maybe we could just drop it and only keep "Why a new version"?

Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Big was supposed to communicate that sweeping changes are taking place in plain-language (without the "major version" jargon and the odd-sounding/confusing phrasing that it necessitates...."Why a new major version" sounds odd, but "Why a major new version" does not...probably related to points noted in this BBC article...).

I've pushed an update to just "Why a new version?" which I think is good enough, let me know if you've got any other suggestions.

ericsnekbytesand others added4 commitsApril 25, 2023 08:37
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Tuloup <jeremy.tuloup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Tuloup <jeremy.tuloup@gmail.com>
@jtpio
Copy link
Member

Looks like it needs a lint pass to fix the CI check (jlpm run prettier should do it).

@ericsnekbytes
Copy link
CollaboratorAuthor

That's done.

@jtpio
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

ericsnekbytes reacted with laugh emoji

@jtpiojtpio merged commit68f10a2 intojupyter:mainApr 27, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsApr 28, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.

Reviewers

@jtpiojtpiojtpio left review comments

Assignees

@ericsnekbytesericsnekbytes

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ericsnekbytes@echarles@jtpio

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp