Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fix: Javascript's earlier names#3869

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
vishal0902 wants to merge1 commit intojavascript-tutorial:master
base:master
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromvishal0902:fix-js-earlier-names

Conversation

vishal0902
Copy link

Initially, Javscript was called "Mocha", then changed to "LiveScript" before finally being named JavaScript.

@javascript-translate-botjavascript-translate-bot added the review neededReview needed, please approve or request changes labelAug 22, 2025
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commentedAug 22, 2025
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@joaquinelio
Copy link
Member

I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose.
The focus is “why JavaScript” and explained mentioning LiveScript as a previous name.
Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the tutorial.

According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released under that name.

@vishal0902
Copy link
Author

vishal0902 commentedAug 22, 2025 via email

Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript".Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an articleabout Brenda Rich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in careersection. Here's the link -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_EichBy the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Greatwork.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, 20:14 joaquinelio, ***@***.***> wrote: *joaquinelio* left a comment (javascript-tutorial/en.javascript.info#3869) <#3869 (comment)> I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose. The focus is “why JavaScript” and explained mentioning LiveScript as a previous name. Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the tutorial. According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released under that name. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3869 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX3GOG3747TJX4F5J7HSC6D3O4UEXAVCNFSM6AAAAACEQ2DVD2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMJUGYZTANRTGU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

@vishal0902
Copy link
Author

vishal0902 commentedAug 22, 2025 via email

Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript".Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an articleabout Brendan Eich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in careersection. Here's the link -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_EichBy the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Greatwork.On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, 20:26 Vishal Srivastava, ***@***.***>wrote:
Yes you said it right because the focus is on "why JavaScript". Actually I read about this on Wikipedia when I was going through an article about Brenda Rich, the creator of JavaScript. I read this in career section. Here's the link -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich By the way, javascript.info is the best resource I have ever found. Great work. On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, 20:14 joaquinelio, ***@***.***> wrote:> *joaquinelio* left a comment> (javascript-tutorial/en.javascript.info#3869)> <#3869 (comment)>>> I don’t think this addition is useful for the header purpose.> The focus is “why JavaScript” and explained mentioning LiveScript as a> previous name.> Mocha may be also confused with the framework explained later in the> tutorial.>> According to chatgpt, Mocha was an internal codename and never released> under that name.>> —> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub> <#3869 (comment)>,> or unsubscribe> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX3GOG3747TJX4F5J7HSC6D3O4UEXAVCNFSM6AAAAACEQ2DVD2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMJUGYZTANRTGU>> .> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:> ***@***.***>>

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
review neededReview needed, please approve or request changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@vishal0902@CLAassistant@joaquinelio@javascript-translate-bot

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp