@kdionyso not opposed to adding, but one issue with tiff, aren't both .tif and .tiff equally common or do you find .tif is most used?

Apologies for the very very tardy reply,@rwightman. I believe that ".tif" files are more common in the remote sensing/earth observation community and this is why I recommended adding that capability. There are possibly use cases for ".tiff" files as well, but to be honest I have not come across files with this extension in my line of work. Awesome work by the way :)

It seems .tiff would be the canonical form, judging from specification names: "TIFF/EP (ISO 12234-2), TIFF/IT (ISO 12639),[3][4][5] TIFF-F (RFC 2306) and TIFF-FX (RFC 3949).[6]" (fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TIFF).

In any case, our microscopes create .tiff files (biomedical domain).

Sounds like it's safest to include both. It would be very useful to us

@VarIr@metazool@kdionyso
I decided to support this a different way, let people change the defaults. So I'll keep the defaults as is for now, but you can easily change them now (before you create a dataset/parser and initiate the file scan).

>>> timm.data.get_img_extensions()('.png', '.jpg', '.jpeg')>>> timm.data.add_img_extensions(['.tif', '.tiff'])>>> timm.data.get_img_extensions()('.png', '.jpg', '.jpeg', '.tif', '.tiff')>>> timm.data.set_img_extensions(['.tif', '.tiff'])>>> timm.data.get_img_extensions()('.tif', '.tiff')>>> timm.data.del_img_extensions('.tiff')>>> timm.data.get_img_extensions()('.tif',)

bfc0dcc

EDIT this will be merged later today / tomorrow