Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Allow data: to not be part of sanitizer’s allowed protocols#412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
charmander wants to merge1 commit intohtml5lib:master
base:master
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromcharmander:patch-1

Conversation

charmander
Copy link

Whendata: wasn’t permitted, it could attempt todel attrs[attr] twice.

When `data:` wasn’t permitted, it could attempt to `del attrs[attr]` twice.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commentedFeb 21, 2019
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#412 intomaster willnot change coverage.
The diff coverage is100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@##           master     #412   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   90.79%   90.79%           =======================================  Files          50       50             Lines        6952     6952             Branches     1328     1328           =======================================  Hits         6312     6312             Misses        481      481             Partials      159      159
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
html5lib/filters/sanitizer.py93.16% <100%> (ø)⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend -Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered byCodecov. Last update4f92357...e4757eb. Read thecomment docs.

@twm
Copy link
Contributor

twm commentedMar 2, 2019

The change looks valid, but shouldn't there be a test case for this?

hugovk and ambv reacted with thumbs up emoji

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@charmander@codecov-io@twm@gsnedders

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp