Code quality remained the same when pulling85de9fd on gsnedders:codecov into46dae3d on html5lib:master.

Build failure is because coverage >= 4.0.0 doesn't support 3.2

codecov/codecov-python#48

For the curious wondering why we're going with the more obscure codecov instead of coveralls: codecov have branch coverage.

Critic review:https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/6052

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please donot make in-place history rewrites (e.g. viagit rebase -i orgit commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

Repository health decreased by 0.33% when pullingeb56e79 on gsnedders:codecov into46dae3d on html5lib:master.

• 2 new problems were found (including 1 error and 1 code smell).
• 5 problems were fixed (including 1 error and 4 code smells).

PyPy with coverage seemsreally slow for some reason; should probably move to only having coverage with CPython.

And PyPy3k fails big-time with stuff like:

html5lib/tests/tree_construction.py:65: in runtest    output = convertTreeDump(p.tree.testSerializer(document))html5lib/treebuilders/etree.py:319: in testSerializer    return testSerializer(element)E   TypeError: testSerializer() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)

Repository health decreased by 0.33% when pullingc3ca303 on gsnedders:codecov into46dae3d on html5lib:master.

• 2 new problems were found (including 1 error and 1 code smell).
• 5 problems were fixed (including 1 error and 4 code smells).

The PyPy3k issue is reported ashttps://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/2225/pypy3k-settrace-_trace-messes-up-scoping FWIW

Code quality remained the same when pulling969d29b on gsnedders:codecov into4205423 on html5lib:master.

@jgraham r?

Current coverage is89.41%

Branch#220 has no coverage reports uploaded yet.

No diff could be generated. No reports formaster found.
Review entireCoverage Diff as of8352c62

Powered byCodecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

Code quality remained the same when pullingc7fbb91 on gsnedders:codecov intod999875 on html5lib:master.

Code quality remained the same when pulling9e27ea1 on gsnedders:codecov intod999875 on html5lib:master.

Code quality remained the same when pullingfc0077a on gsnedders:codecov intod999875 on html5lib:master.

Code quality remained the same when pullinga231231 on gsnedders:codecov intod999875 on html5lib:master.

Code quality remained the same when pulling66a3f42 on gsnedders:codecov into91876a7 on html5lib:master.