Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

perf: remove redundant array deepcopy#26

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
tswast merged 7 commits intogoogleapis:masterfromgrooveygr:master
Oct 7, 2020

Conversation

@grooveygr
Copy link
Contributor

Deepcopy can be a very costly operation when considering large arrays with complex nested objects.
Refactor helpers to allow recursive conversion without copying arrays.

Fixes#6 🦕

deepcopy can be a very costly operation when considering large arrays with complex nested objects.refactor helpers to allow recursive conversion without copying arrays.
@googlebotgooglebot added the cla: yesThis human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labelFeb 6, 2020
@tseavertseaver changed the titleperf(bigquery): remove redundant array deepcopyperf: remove redundant array deepcopyJul 30, 2020
@tseavertseaver added the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 30, 2020
@yoshi-kokoroyoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelJul 30, 2020
@tseavertseaver requested a review fromplamutJuly 30, 2020 18:09
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

@plamut I'm less familiar than you with this bit of the code. PTAL.

@tseavertseaver added the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelAug 6, 2020
@yoshi-kokoroyoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelAug 6, 2020
@tswasttswast requested a review froma teamSeptember 24, 2020 21:13
@tswasttswast added the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelOct 6, 2020
Co-authored-by: Bu Sun Kim <8822365+busunkim96@users.noreply.github.com>
@yoshi-kokoroyoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelOct 6, 2020
@tswasttswast added the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelOct 6, 2020
@yoshi-kokoroyoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:runAdd this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labelOct 6, 2020
@tswasttswast merged commitb54f867 intogoogleapis:masterOct 7, 2020
gcf-merge-on-greenbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull requestOct 8, 2020
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* ---## [2.1.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/compare/v2.0.0...v2.1.0) (2020-10-08)### Features* add constants for MONTH and YEAR time partitioning types ([#283](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/283)) ([9090e1c](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/9090e1ccd8825a97835325b4829f6e7ecfd9ea88))### Bug Fixes* remove unnecessary dependency on libcst ([#308](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/308)) ([c055930](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/c05593094c1405f752b2c51b15202a6dbb5cb83f))### Performance Improvements* remove redundant array deepcopy ([#26](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/26)) ([b54f867](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/b54f86769c982ce5c8fcbf3889f82450428bb40c))### Documentation* **samples:** add create_table_clustered code snippet ([#291](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/291)) ([d1eb8b3](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/d1eb8b3dcc789916c5d3ba8464f62b1f8bef35ff))---This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please).
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tswasttswasttswast approved these changes

@plamutplamutAwaiting requested review from plamut

+1 more reviewer

@busunkim96busunkim96busunkim96 left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cla: yesThis human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BigQuery: complex repeated schema fields are slow

6 participants

@grooveygr@tseaver@tswast@busunkim96@googlebot@yoshi-kokoro

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp