Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Restructure Fuzzer Seed Data#2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
Byron merged 1 commit intomainfromrefactor-gitpython-dir-and-improve-readme
May 8, 2024

Conversation

DaveLak
Copy link
Collaborator

@DaveLakDaveLak commentedMay 8, 2024
edited
Loading

Merging this change requiresgitpython-developers/GitPython#1913, the corresponding GitPython PR, to be merged at the same time in the GitPython repo to update the OSS-Fuzz scripts to prevent breaking the builds.

The most significant change introduced here is replacing the.zip files containing seed corpora with sub-directories for each fuzz target containing an uncompressed corpus. This change makes it easier to update each corpus on a per-input-blob basis, as well as making the content of each corpus easier to inspect manually.

The inputs added in this commit are taken directly from the corpora backups generated by ClusterFuzz/OSS-Fuzz and can (and should) likely be reduced to their minimal sets in a follow-up PR.

Other changes:

  • Renamed thedict sub-directory todictionaries for clarity.
  • Updated the README to better document what this repository contains. The README could use some improvement as well, including instructions for contributing and generating new inputs, but for now it should be good enough (I hope.) The "Dictionaries" section was migrated from the GitPython fuzzing README.

**Merging this change requires a corresponding PR to be merged at the same timein the GitPython repo to update the OSS-Fuzz scripts to prevent breaking thebuilds.**The most significant change introduced here is replacing the `.zip` filescontaining seed corpora with sub-directories for each fuzz target containing anuncompressed corpus. This change makes it easier to update each corpus on aper-input-blob basis, as well as making the content of each corpus easier toinspect manually.The inputs added in this commit are taken directly from the corpora backupsgenerated by ClusterFuzz/OSS-Fuzz and can (and should) likely be reduced totheir minimal sets in a follow-up PR.Other changes:- Renamed the `dict` sub-directory to `dictionaries` for clarity.- Updated the README to better document what this repository contains. The README  could use some improvement as well, including instructions for contributing and  generating new inputs, but for now it should be good enough (I hope.) The  "Dictionaries" section was migrated from the GitPython fuzzing README.
DaveLak added a commit to DaveLak/GitPython that referenced this pull requestMay 8, 2024
This change is required to support the changes to the seed data repostructure introduced in:gitpython-developers/qa-assets#2This moves most of the seed data related build steps into the OSS-FuzzDocker image build via `container-environment-bootstrap.sh`. Thisincludes moveing the dictionaries into that repo.The fuzzing/README.md here should be updated in a follow-up with a linkto the qa-assets repo (and probably some context setting about corporain general) but I have opted to defer that as I think the functionalityadded by the seed data improvements is valuable as is and shouldn't beblocked by documentation writers block.
@DaveLakDaveLak requested a review fromByronMay 8, 2024 07:31
@DaveLakDaveLak marked this pull request as ready for reviewMay 8, 2024 07:32
@ByronByron merged commitc1a5b83 intomainMay 8, 2024
@ByronByron deleted the refactor-gitpython-dir-and-improve-readme branchMay 8, 2024 14:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ByronByronAwaiting requested review from Byron

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@DaveLak@Byron

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp