Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fix setup.py and use of requirements files and add a docker test container#826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jeking3
Copy link
Contributor

@jeking3jeking3 commentedJan 15, 2019
edited
Loading

Before:

jking@ubuntu:~/GitPython$ python3 setup.py check/usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'test_requirements'  warnings.warn(msg)running check

Note thatsetup.py was not even using the contents ofrequirements.txt ortest-requirements.txt. Now it does, and it properly identifies thetests-require field. Therequirements.txt file declared a runtime dependency on a testing package. I'm assuming that is an error (although it could be used in production code, I don't know...) so I removed that.

When I ran tox locally on Python 3.6.7 I saw a flake8 error F821 which I disabled as it looks bogus - that exception is defined in the documentation.

Added a docker container that you can use with a couple new make targets. This allows you to run python 2.7, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, or 3.7 tox even if you are on a local branch not named "master" (some tests require this).

Finally, found and fixed the issue on CI with python 3.7 / Xenial / travis. The root cause is that in git 2.20 new behavior was introduced to stop "git fetch --tags" from clobbering local tags that have changed:git/git@0bc8d71

The unit tests expect the old behavior, so now we pass --force down if the version is 2.20 or higher (for the remote test only, the code change is in the test code). It took a while to find this because for some reason when GitCommandError returns an error code, stderr isn't captured. If it was, it would have been easier to figure this out...

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

It looks like CI isn't healthy. Do you want some help with that?

cclauss and Byron reacted with thumbs up emoji

@Byron
Copy link
Member

Thanks a bunch for uncovering this, and for the fix!

It looks like one travis failure legit, asit is flake not liking some whitespace.
Theother travis failure looks like it is related to the - now - flaky Remote test, which also fails consistently in#825 .

Please have a look at the comment there - maybe we can make a fix here so#825 can then be merged, too.

CC@cclauss

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commentedJan 20, 2019
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#826 intomaster willdecrease coverage by0.12%.
The diff coverage is100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@##           master     #826      +/-   ##==========================================- Coverage   94.79%   94.67%   -0.13%==========================================  Files          59       59                Lines        9603     9386     -217     ==========================================- Hits         9103     8886     -217  Misses        500      500
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
git/cmd.py83.83% <100%> (-0.18%)⬇️
git/objects/tree.py59.64% <0%> (-0.93%)⬇️
git/index/util.py90.69% <0%> (-0.61%)⬇️
git/index/typ.py96.82% <0%> (-0.58%)⬇️
git/refs/log.py93.84% <0%> (-0.53%)⬇️
git/objects/base.py95.83% <0%> (-0.33%)⬇️
git/refs/tag.py96.66% <0%> (-0.31%)⬇️
git/test/lib/helper.py91.86% <0%> (-0.28%)⬇️
git/refs/reference.py95.74% <0%> (-0.26%)⬇️
git/objects/commit.py91.59% <0%> (-0.25%)⬇️
... and27 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend -Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered byCodecov. Last update1f66e25...21b712a. Read thecomment docs.

@jeking3jeking3force-pushed thefix-requirements branch 2 times, most recently from023b17e toc045246CompareJanuary 20, 2019 15:58
@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

Run Python 3.7 inallow_failures mode until#827 is fixed?

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

What about the windows failures?

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commentedJan 25, 2019
edited
Loading

FileNotFoundError: [WinError 2] The system cannot find the file specified:    'C:\\Miniconda35-x64\\lib\\site-packages\\setuptools-27.2.0-py3.5.egg'

But the lines just above that say that thecurrent version of setuptools (40.6.3) was just installed. Either don't upgrade setup tools or eliminate the hardcoding of setuptools-27.2.0.

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

What I was asking is do you want to ignore those too?

I'd prefer to merge this, and then deal with the CI failures, instead of bundling them all together... these changes improve (and fix) the setup.py issues.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

You are asking the wrong guy... I have never been a Windows fan. ;-) I would vote to move forward as is.

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Do we need the last three windows builds for "miniconda" or "git running in cygwin on windows"? The latter just looks like a test environment failure as it is passing windows paths (from the windows native python 3.5-x64) into a program looking for a unix path. I have no idea what the "conda" ones are or if they provide any real value.

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

The test suite makes a very bad assumption that you are on the master branch. When I work on a project, I fork it, then I make a branch for each of the changes I am making, and submit pull requests from the branch into the upstream master. This is best practices for github development.

I cannot run the test suite if I have anything else checked out. The test suite fails. It is making some bad assumptions. When I run inside a docker container and skip past those, even with python 3.6, I'm seeing other issues like utf8 issues.

@jeking3jeking3force-pushed thefix-requirements branch 2 times, most recently from0ede297 to03342ceCompareFebruary 5, 2019 21:58
@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I worked around the issues by checking out a copy of the repository from github into the container at a well-known location. This way the unit tests can run against a fresh clone of the repository and succeed.

@jeking3jeking3force-pushed thefix-requirements branch 4 times, most recently from56a06d8 toe5b03d4CompareFebruary 5, 2019 22:45
@jeking3jeking3 changed the titleFix setup.py and use of requirements files.Fix setup.py and use of requirements files, add a docker test container, and fix a git 2.20 test issueFeb 6, 2019
@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I'm going to tease this apart into smaller bits...

@jeking3jeking3 changed the titleFix setup.py and use of requirements files, add a docker test container, and fix a git 2.20 test issue-DO NOT MERGE] Fix setup.py and use of requirements files, add a docker test container, and fix a git 2.20 test issueFeb 6, 2019
@jeking3jeking3 reopened thisMay 5, 2019
@jeking3jeking3 changed the title-DO NOT MERGE] Fix setup.py and use of requirements files, add a docker test container, and fix a git 2.20 test issueFix setup.py and use of requirements files and add a docker test containerMay 5, 2019
@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@Byron consider merging this. The appveyor jobs are passing, at least the ones known to pass, and there are some that are known failures; it would still be nice to get all the CI builds to green since that makes it so much easier to determine if a pull request is even worth looking into.

@ByronByron merged commit52ee33a intogitpython-developers:masterMay 5, 2019
@Byron
Copy link
Member

Hi@jeking3 , thanks so much for your persistency. Right now I am very short on time and am far away from this, and any other of my open source projects, which must be frustrating for GitPython's user base.

Maybe it would help if there were more collaborators - I have invited you in case this sounds feasible to you.

@jeking3
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I'll do what I can. Apart from founding a new company, I'm also involved in boost, apache thrift, and a couple other efforts. At the very least if I can get the CI builds to run clean and have folks rebase their pull requests, it would be a lot easier to qualify things in the pipeline. Thanks!

@jeking3jeking3 deleted the fix-requirements branchMay 5, 2019 16:31
@ByronByron added this to thev2.1.12 - Bugfixes milestoneJul 20, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cclausscclausscclauss approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@jeking3@Byron@codecov-io@cclauss

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp