Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Add new implementation of relative time#300

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
leduyquang753 wants to merge3 commits intogithub:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromleduyquang753:relativeTime

Conversation

leduyquang753
Copy link
Contributor

(This is part of a set of multiple pull requests looking to overhaul the calculation functions.)

This pull request adds a newrelativeTime function that directly takes two date values and outputs a single-unit relative time point, with more robust logic compared to the current implementation.

Accordingly, the logic of the relative time element for therelative format is changed to use the new function.

@leduyquang753leduyquang753 requested a review froma team as acode ownerDecember 31, 2024 09:13
@leduyquang753
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

The failing test in the first check:

 ❌ relative-time > [tense=past] > micro formats years      AssertionError: expected '11y' to equal '10y'      + expected - actual            -11y      +10y            at n4.<anonymous> (test/relative-time.js:531:13)

is caused by the original test usingnew Date() which makes the result vary according to the time of the year. The related feature is not affected by this pull request.

@@ -453,7 +454,7 @@ export class RelativeTimeElement extends HTMLElement implements Intl.DateTimeFor
if (format === 'duration') {
newText = this.#getDurationFormat(duration)
} else if (format === 'relative') {
newText = this.#getRelativeFormat(duration)
newText = this.#getRelativeFormat(date)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The intent of using durations here is to anticipateTemporal becoming part of the web platform.

We calculate the duration of the two dates and return a proxy object forTemporal.Duration, so that we can in turn hope to callround on this duration, to get a single unit duration object, which can then be more easily fed intoIntl.RelativeTimeFormat.

TheTemporal.Duration#round function is very complex, and so for now we haveroundToSingleUnit as a "simplified" version of this function, which provides the minimum viable requirements for this code.

The hope is that, onceTemporal is a part of the web platform, we can delete a lot of the delicate date code in this library.

The change in this PR, while reasonable in isolation, steps us further away from this goal of steering toward Temporal.

Having said that I'm sure this PR can be factored such that it maintains this goal. It might be worth looking at theround API to figure out how to change the inputs torelativeTime. Perhaps it is worth taking the functionality ofrelativeTime and factoring it intoroundToSingleUnit?

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

That makes me question then why an already existing implementation of theround function could not be adopted.

Perhaps it is worth taking the functionality ofrelativeTime and factoring it intoroundToSingleUnit?

Sure, it can be quickly done. Without knowing theTemporal vision I made a new function with a different signature because calculating a duration then calculating back the original date would be a very roundabout thing to do. Perhaps then I will raise this concern totc39/proposal-temporal.

@leduyquang753
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have applied this implementation toroundToSingleUnit in#301, if that is better then this pull request can be discarded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@keithamuskeithamusAwaiting requested review from keithamus

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@leduyquang753@keithamus

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp